Advertisement
Research Article

From Oxford to Hawaii Ecophysiological Barriers Limit Human Progression in Ten Sport Monuments

  • François-Denis Desgorces mail,

    Francois.Desgorces@univ-paris5.fr

    Affiliations: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France

    X
  • Geoffroy Berthelot,

    Affiliation: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France

    X
  • Nour El Helou,

    Affiliation: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France

    X
  • Valérie Thibault,

    Affiliation: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France

    X
  • Marion Guillaume,

    Affiliation: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France

    X
  • Muriel Tafflet,

    Affiliation: INSERM U909, université Paris Descartes, IFR 69 Paris Sud Université, Villejuif, France

    X
  • Olivier Hermine,

    Affiliations: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France, Service d'hématologie Hôpital Necker and CNRS UMR 8147, Paris, France

    X
  • Jean-François Toussaint

    Affiliations: IRMES, Institut de Recherche Médicale et d'Epidémiologie du Sport, INSEP, Paris, France, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France, CIMS, Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

    X
  • Published: November 05, 2008
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003653

Abstract

In order to understand the determinants and trends of human performance evolution, we analyzed ten outdoor events among the oldest and most popular in sports history. Best performances of the Oxford-Cambridge boat race (since 1836), the channel crossing in swimming (1875), the hour cycling record (1893), the Elfstedentocht speed skating race (1909), the cross country ski Vasaloppet (1922), the speed ski record (1930), the Streif down-hill in Kitzbühel (1947), the eastward and westward sailing transatlantic records (1960) and the triathlon Hawaii ironman (1978) all follow a similar evolutive pattern, best described through a piecewise exponential decaying model (r2 = 0.95±0.07). The oldest events present highest progression curvature during their early phase. Performance asymptotic limits predicted from the model may be achieved in fourty years (2049±32 y). Prolonged progression may be anticipated in disciplines which further rely on technology such as sailing and cycling. Human progression in outdoor sports tends to asymptotic limits depending on physiological and environmental parameters and may temporarily benefit from further technological progresses.

Introduction

World records (WR) highlight the progression of human performance. Our group recently analyzed WR from 5 measurable Olympic disciplines and demonstrated a major global fading in WR progression following a piecewise exponential decaying pattern [1]. Track and field, weight lifting or swimming competitions take place in a finite context with standardization of competitive fields, controlled environmental factors and major influence of physiological capacity on performance whereas outdoor sports are usually considered to be more influenced by environmental conditions, material or technical constraints. Therefore, outdoor events among the oldest and most popular have been ignored by previous studies that have analyzed human performance evolution [1], [2].

Performance depends on trainable variables (related to physiology, psychology, biomechanics, tactics) and other factors beyond the athlete's control (genetics, environment, climatic conditions) [3]. Environmental factors may modify results according to the discipline rules, mobility milieu (snow, ice, water, air), motion type (running, cycling, skiing, swimming) or duration of the event. As a result, International Federation of Rowing Associations, as well as other federations do not provide world records, though events “best times” are available [4]. We hypothesized that performance evolution of outdoor sports events would also follow a piecewise exponential decaying pattern.

Materials and Methods

Ten outdoor events among the most popular in the world, performed in non motorized sports and presenting large variations in duration, longevity, competitive circumstances and frequency were analysed (Table 1). The Oxford-Cambridge rowing race is challenged since 1829, with an unchanged course against the streams of the Thames from “Putney to Mortlake” since 1845 [5], [6]. The Vasaloppet is a Swedish long distance cross-country skiing race held on the first Sunday of March between the village of Sälen and town of Mora for 90 km [6], [7]. Since 1909 the speed skating race “Elfstedentocht” takes place in the canals of the Dutch Friesland when ice freezes over the 200 km route around Leeuwarden [6], [8]. The record of transatlantic crew sailing eastward from New-York “Ambrose Light” tower to English “Lizard Point” (5417 km) was first set by Charlie Barr's crew in 1905 but the record has only been challenged for a few decades starting with Eric Tabarly [6], [9]. The oldest solo ocean race is challenged sailing transatlantic westward every four years from Plymouth to New England (Newport or Boston, orthodromic track: 5185 km) starting with Sir Francis Chichester in 1960 [6], [9]. The speed ski record is challenged since 1930 in varied places (Portillo, Chile; Silverton, USA; Les Arcs, France) and determined in a timing zone 100 meters long [6], [10]. The hour cycling record is accounted as firstly challenged outdoor in Paris since 1876 and registered by the International Cyclist Union (ICU) and the International Human Powered Vehicle Association (IHPVA) with different acceptance in the bicycle type used for the record [6], [11], [12]. The Streif (Kitzbühel, Austria) down-hill ski is 3312 m long with an 27% average gradient, held since 1930 and part of the ski world cup since 1967 [6], [13]. The Hawaiian Ironman is the first modern long-distance triathlon (3.86 km swimming, 180.2 km cycling and 42.2 km running). Starting in 1978, each year it is considered to be the World championship in long-distance triathlon [6], [14]. The channel crossing swim is usually challenged between Shakespeare beach (Dover, England) to “Cap gris nez” (France) over 33.8 km; firstly held in 1875 it has been regulated since 1927 [6], [15]. For all events, best performances (BP) only (equivalent to the race record) are accounted for into the analysis [5][15].

thumbnail

Table 1. Event parameters: longevity, occurrence and available performance number.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.t001

Function description and prediction

We performed BP modelisation as previously reported [1]: performance series for each event are fitted by the following function: yj (t) = ΔBP exp(−aj.t′)+b; where ΔBP = BPi,jBPf,j is an event indicator for the studied j period; BPi,j and BPf,j are the initial and final BP values respectively; aj is the positive curvature factor given by non linear regression; b is the asymptotic limit. Coefficients a, b and estimated predictions (years, asymptotic values) are obtained through an iterative algorithm.

The ratios β (progression range since the beginning of the event) and β′ (present progression range) were calculated to describe the improvement over the final time frame in each event by using the following equation: β = (BPi/b)×100 and β′ = (BPf/b)×100.

For each event, this piecewise exponential decaying model provides successive periods. A period refers to a time slot defined by a group of consecutive BP, following a rupture of incline. A procedure based on the best adjusted r2 was used to split BP series into periods. The algorithm was initiated by the first three BP values. The series was iteratively fitted by adding the next BP point using the presented above equation equation. For each fit, we obtained the adjusted r2; local maxima provide the changes of incline corresponding to the beginning of a new period. The minimum period duration is 6 years and the minimal BP number is three per period.

During the period j, parameters aj and bj were estimated using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LMA) [16] in a non linear least-squares regression to fit the model to BP. Coefficients of the prediction equation were calculated for the last period of each event through LMA with credibility interval [17]. The result was used to estimate the year t when the 99.95% (1/2000) limit is reached.

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.

Results

The collected data provided a mean of 17.6±7.1 BP per event. Events had large differences in their initial progression range (β = 46.27±13.5%). Present mean achievement of the asymptotic performance, β′, was 94.6±7.%2 with seven events over 97%. Events with the lowest β and β′ coefficients were: sailing transatlantic records, Streif and speed ski record and IHPVA hour cycling record (gathered in group 1: β1 = 37.5±9.5%; β′1 = 90.4±8.8%) whereas group 2 sport events: Oxford-Cambridge, Vasaloppet, Elfstedentocht, Ironman, Channel crossing and ICU Hour cycling record had higher values (β2 = 53.5±12.1%; β′2 = 98.0±3.2%).

The model fits progression periods, depending on the events' longevity, with high accuracy (r2 = 0.95±0.07). A first progression period (XIXth and beginning of XXth century) was modeled for the older events (Oxford-Cambridge, Vasaloppet, speed ski record, ICU cycling: r2 = 0.97±0.03, a = 1.93±0.96 and β′ = 57.6±8.9%; Figure 1). A second progression period starts in the early XXth century for seven events (the four previous ones plus Channel crossing, Elfstedentocht (Figure 2) and IHPVA cycling: r2 = 0.95±0.03, a = 0.97±0.45, β′ = 73.15±16.8%). Modeled curves for the last period of all 10 events start in the middle of the XXth century (r2 = 0.95±0.04, a = 1.28±0.51, β′ = 94.5±7.2%). The progression of the transatlantic records, the Hawaii Ironman and Streif down-hill are modeled by a mono-exponential curve (Figure 3). The curves for the hour cycling record progression according to the specific associations' rules (ICU and IHPVA) are compared in Figure 4.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Model fitting for events with three progression periods.

Performances of the Oxford-Cambridge boat race, Vasaloppet cross-country ski and speed ski record (for covering a 100-m distance) in seconds.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Model fitting for events with two progression periods.

Performances of the Elfstedentocht speed skating race (normalized distance of 200 km) in hours and of the Channel crossing swimming in minutes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Model fitting for three events with a single progression period.

Performances of the Eastward Crew and Westward Solo transatlantic records in hours, of the Hawaii Ironman in minutes and of the Streif down-hill in seconds.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.g003
thumbnail

Figure 4. Model fitting for the hour cycling record.

Hour cycling records in kilometres. Black lines and squares for record stated by the International Cyclist Union. Grey lines and diamonds for the record stated by the International Human Powered Vehicle Association.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.g004

The year when mean BP will be established at 99.95% of their asymptotic value is predicted to be 2049±32.1 years (Table 2).

thumbnail

Table 2. Coefficients and function fit for the asymptotic limit prediction.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003653.t002

Discussion

Our study is the first to model the performance evolution of outdoor sport events influenced by physiological, technological and environmental factors. Although the studied events largely differ in longevity, duration and physical environment (ice, snow, water, ground, air), the piecewise decaying exponential model describes a common evolutive pattern. Older events BPs follow a progression with high curvature coefficients suggesting the same rapid improvement in the early phase and a profile made up of two or three periods over the XIXth and XXth centuries. In addition, the initial β state that we estimated here is lower than the value previously calculated for Olympic sports (46% vs 60%), which may be due to the fact that here we took into account all records starting at day 0, whereas national Track & Field or Speed Skating competitions had already started long before the first Olympic games [1]. This emphasizes the particular status of these sport monuments in their own discipline.

Robert Fogel [18] previously used the term “techno-physiological evolution” to describe human health and anthropometric gains over the last three centuries. Similar improvements occured over the XXth century (enhanced physical training, higher number of participants, nutritional practice, biological knowledge and medical advances) in sports like rowing [19], cross-country skiing [20], [21], speed skating [22] or cycling [23], which are sports with high aerobic requirements. Indeed, these events present similar progression patterns (a and β coefficients) than those obtained in Olympic disciplines performed in a controled environment and quantified by world records [1].

Predictions of the BP asymptotic limits from the piecewise exponential model suggest that the achievement of human limits may occur during the XXIth century. Furthermore, our model suggests that the limits will be rapidly reached in events highly dependent on physiological capabilities, e.g. expected performance improvements over the next century in Oxford–Cambridge, Vasaloppet and Elfstedentocht are lower than 2%. The most recent of these events, the Hawaii Ironman, may have already achieved its asymptotic value (β′ value: 99.64%) although it has been challenged since three decades only. The performance evolution for this event may be based on its rapidly growing popularity and benefits from the advances previously made in the three sports involved in triathlon (swimming, cycling, running). These results compared to those published for world records [1] suggest that environmental and climatic conditions, though influencing a year to year performance progression, do not modify the secular trend toward ultimate performance achievement.

Maximal boat speed in transatlantic records largely depends on environmental conditions (north Atlantic depression speed and numbers) rather than on individuals' physical power. Tools have been developed to control, at least partly, environmental factors for the athlete's benefits: e.g. navigation equipments allow for information to be transmitted to, or from, the boat in order to better take advantage of a major depression as well as of the lightest wind. Also, an increased knowledge and online computation now allows for a better use of sea streams. In addition, some events (speed ski, eastward transatlantic sailing, hour cycling) can be organized when optimal spatial and meteorological conditions are met in order to enhance probabilities to break a record. Choice for an event frequency and location may possibly influence BP occurrence and allow for a tight control of physical and climatic parameters. On the other side, the inability to organize the Elfstedentocht race due to the lack of thick ice between 1986 and 1997 and until now also demonstrates the major dependence of these competitions on climatic conditions [8]. Therefore, the progression of the Elfstedentocht performances could not benefit from the new skate technology that improved world skating records since 1998 [1], [24]. In a pre-determined place and date, Oxford defeated Cambridge in 2008 with the slowest time since 1947 and because of blustery and rough conditions the Cambridge boat sank in 1978 [5]. In 1987, the finishing time of the coldest Vasaloppet (−30°C) was 16 minutes longer than the record stated the year before. On another hand, due to extremely mild weather, the race was cancelled in 1990. However, as calculations integrate performances under-constraints, the particular environmental and climatic influences do not change the common pattern of performance evolution.

Our results demonstrate that higher progression rates remain plausible when rules allow for greater impact from technology. Sailing records present the lowest β and β′ coefficients compared with rowing, cross-country skiing, triathlon or ICU cycling (group 2). The influence of technology is best demonstrated in the hour cycling record: the ICU “physiological” record limit is almost achieved at about 50 km/h, when using a vehicle similar to the Eddy Merckx bicycle but the predicted limit is much higher for the “technological” IHPVA value (91.94±3.58 km/h). In addition, the delay for achieving limits may be larger than for events highly influenced by physiological capabilities (2030 for group 2 vs. 2075 for group 1), as technology keeps modifying boats in transatlantic records (e.g. gauge, size and class, hull and keel types, sail surface), equipment for ski records (e.g. ski length and composition, aerodynamic helmets, latex or polyurethane suits) or aerodynamic surface in torpedo-like bikes [9], [10]. Although techno-physiological improvements allow for the enhancement of propulsive efficiency they remain under sport rules control: conception of rowing boats introduced carbon fiber use in 1972 and larger blades increased propulsive efficiency after 1991, but FISA banned sliding-rigger boats, which largely increased boat speed in order to limit technology influence and too expensive materials [4].

Anti-doping policies are elaborated to restrain pharmacological impacts within health perspectives [25] but technological advances are accepted within sport rules and identity (e.g. minimum weights for each class boat in rowing; Vasaloppet performed in classic style; Channel crossing with swim suits and hat without thermal protection or buoyancy capabilities) [4], [7], [15]. Conversely, the speed ski record, one of the fastest non motorized sport on land, seems to have reached its limits after 70 years of technological improvements under major environmental constraints (e.g. air penetration coefficient, snow quality, slope). Thus, if international federations, pushed by public demand and media coverage, want to develop sport on a pure performance basis with the fascination of newly established records, their need for technology will constantly increase. Swimming is the recent demonstration of such evolution with the introduction of swimming suits in 1998 and of second generation models in 2008 that allow for a 1 to 2% increase in speed [26]. However, close future and popularity of these sport monuments depend more on their history, identity and scenery than on continuous performance increase.

The present study suggests: i) the universality of the piecewise exponential model to describe the evolution of very short (1,4s) to very long sport performances (400 hours), six orders of magnitude apart; ii) a common law of progression in most sports toward ecophysiological limits; iii) major physiological constraints in the progression pattern of rowing, cross-country skiing, swimming, triathlon and ICU cycling record; iv) technology as a unique way to push back human physiological limits under environmental constraints, but with a major drawback: a constantly growing dependence on it.

In an accelerated process occurring over the XIXth and XXth centuries, sport performances took advantage of a common techno-physiological progression pathway [18] but soon reach their limits. Environnemental constraints now add to these development barriers. Human performance progression during the XXIth century may essentially rely on technological improvements with its own reliance on energy and economy.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Robin Choudhury for careful review and thank the INSEP teams for full support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FDD OH JFT. Performed the experiments: FDD GB NEH MG. Analyzed the data: GB VT MT. Wrote the paper: FDD JFT.

References

  1. 1. Berthelot G, Thibault V, Tafflet M, Escolano S, El Helou N, et al. (2008) The citius end: world records progression announces the completion of a brief ultra-physiological quest. PloS One 3: e1552.
  2. 2. Nevill AM, Whyte GP (2005) Are there limits to running World Records? Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 1785–1788.
  3. 3. Smith DJ (2003) A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance. Sports Med 33: 1103–1126.
  4. 4. The international rowing federation website. Available: http://www.worldrowing.com.
  5. 5. The Oxford Cambridge Boat Race website. Available: http://www.theboatrace.org.
  6. 6. Wikipedia free encyclopedia website. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org.
  7. 7. The Vasaloppet website. Available: http://www.vasaloppet.se.
  8. 8. Elfstedentocht website. Available: http://www.drf.nl/sport/11steden.
  9. 9. World Sailing Speed Record Council website. Available: http://www.sailspeedrecords.com.
  10. 10. France ski de vitesse website. Available: http://www.kl-France.com.
  11. 11. Union cycliste internationale website. Available: http://www.uci.ch.
  12. 12. International Human Powered Vehicle Association website. Available: http://www.ihpva.org.
  13. 13. Kitzbüel Hahnenkamm website. Available: http://www.hahnenkamm.com.
  14. 14. Ironman Hawaii website. Available: http://www.honuhalfironman.com.
  15. 15. Channel Swimming Association website. Available: http://www.channelswimmingassociation.co​m.
  16. 16. More JJ Watson GA, editor. (1977) The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, in Numerical Analysis. Proceedings of the 1977 Dundee conference on numerical analysis.105–116.
  17. 17. Mosegaard K, Malcolm S (2002) Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems. Invers Probl 18: 29–54.
  18. 18. Fogel R (2003) “The escape from premature death and hunger”. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
  19. 19. Fiskestrand A, Seiler KS (2004) Training and performance characteristics among Norwegian international rowers 1970–2001. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14: 303–10.
  20. 20. Eisenman PA, Johnson SC, Bainbridge CN, Zupan MF (1989) Applied physiology of cross-country skiing. Sports Med 8: 67–79.
  21. 21. Rusko HK (1992) Development of aerobic power in relation to age and training in cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 1040–7.
  22. 22. Van Ingen Schenau GJ, de Koning JJ, de Groot G (1994) Optimisation of sprinting performance in running, cycling and speed skating. Sports Med 17: 259–75.
  23. 23. Lucia A, Hoyos J, Chicharro JL (2001) Physiology of professional road cycling. Sports Med 31: 325–37.
  24. 24. De Koning JJ, Houdjik H, De Groot G, Bobbert MF (2000) From biomechanical theory to application in top sports: the klapskate story. Biomech 33: 1225–1229.
  25. 25. Kayser B, Mauron A, Miah A (2007) Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal. BMC Med Ethics 8: 2.
  26. 26. Len S, Berthelot G, Toussaint JF (2008) La performance sportive Française à Pékin: Quels constats ? Quels enseignements ? Quelles perspectives ?