Research Article

Transcriptional Regulation of PIK3CA Oncogene by NF-κB in Ovarian Cancer Microenvironment

  • Nuo Yang,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Jia Huang,

    Affiliation: Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Joel Greshock,

    Affiliations: Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Translational Medicine and Genetics at GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Shun Liang,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Andrea Barchetti,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Kosei Hasegawa,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Sarah Kim,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Antonis Giannakakis,

    Affiliations: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Laboratory of Gene Expression, Modern Diagnostic and Therapeutic Methods, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

  • Chunsheng Li,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Anne O'Brien-Jenkins,

    Affiliation: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Dionyssios Katsaros,

    Affiliation: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

  • Ralf Bützow,

    Affiliations: Department of Obstetrics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Department of Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

  • George Coukos,

    Affiliations: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Lin Zhang mail

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:

    Affiliations: Center for Research on Early Detection and Cure of Ovarian Cancer, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Published: March 12, 2008
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001758


PIK3CA upregulation, amplification and mutation have been widely reported in ovarian cancers and other tumors, which strongly suggests that PIK3CA is a promising therapeutic target. However, to date the mechanisms underlying PIK3CA regulation and activation in vivo is still unclear. During tumorigenesis, host-tumor interactions may play a critical role in editing the tumor. Here, we report a novel mechanism through which the tumor microenvironment activates the PIK3CA oncogene. We show that PIK3CA upregulation occurs in non-proliferating tumor regions in vivo. We identified and characterized the PIK3CA 5′ upstream transcriptional regulatory region and confirmed that PIK3CA is transcriptionally regulated through NF-κB pathway. These results offer a new mechanism through which the tumor microenvironment directly activates oncogenic pathways in tumor cells.


Phosphatidylinositol-3′ kinase (PI-3 kinase) is an intracellular transducer with lipid substrate specificity implicated in a wide range of cancer-associated signaling pathways involved in tumor cell metabolism, survival and proliferation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. It is recruited and activated by multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and generates second messengers via phosphorylation of membrane inositol lipids at the D3 position [3], [8]. PI-3 kinase was first recognized as putative oncogene because of its ability to bind polyoma middle T antigen [9], [10]. Molecular cloning of PI-3 kinases revealed a large and complex family that contains three classes of multiple subunits and isoforms [3], [8]. However, how each subunit precisely contributes to the progress and maintenance of cancer is largely unknown [3], [5].

The PIK3CA gene encodes the catalytic subunit p110-alpha, one of the three catalytic subunit proteins of the class IA PI-3 kinases that are usually activated by growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. PIK3CA was identified as an avian retrovirus-encoded oncogene that transforms chicken embryo fibroblasts [11]. Numerous recent studies indicate that PIK3CA and downstream pathways are frequently targeted by genomic amplification, mutation or overexpression in solid tumors including ovarian cancer [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Previous studies on the function of PIK3CA have predominantly focused on regulatory circuitries within the cancer cell. In vitro, PIK3CA plays a critical role in cell survival and proliferation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [7]. However, to date it remains unknown whether PIK3CA assumes diverse roles depending on the state and/or the context in which the tumor cell is found. Furthermore, it remains unclear how such roles of PIK3CA might be affected by the tumor milieu.

Dynamic interactions between genetic deregulation in tumor cells and reactive molecular and cellular changes in host cells populating the tumor microenvironment play a critical role in promoting malignant transformation and tumor progression and growth [21], [22]. Following the acquisition of critical genetic alterations, tumor cells are subjected to metabolic/ischemic stress and edit the surrounding microenvironment. In turn, host cells serve to edit the tumor, promoting the selection of tumor cells that benefit from tumor microenvironment influences. Innate and adaptive immune response mechanisms to tumors culminating in inflammation have received significant attention in this context, as inflammation has been shown to promote cancer growth and progression [23], [24], [25]. Tumor-associated leukocytes produce numerous proangiogenic factors promoting tumor vascularization [26], [27], [28], [29]. Furthermore, nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), a critical transcriptional regulator of inflammation, has been shown to play a critical role in inflammation-driven carcinogenesis and to promote tumor growth and progression [25], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. It has thus been postulated that the continuous and dynamic cross-talk between tumor cells and host cells ensures the survival of tumor cells and sustains tumor growth [21], [22]. The mutual effects of tumor-host interactions have been characterized with respect to angiogenesis. However, how tumor-host interactions affect directly tumor cells remains partly undetermined.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the most common ovarian malignancy, continues to be the leading cause of death among gynecological malignancies [36]. The lack of preventive strategies, early diagnostic methods and effective therapies to treat recurrent ovarian tumors creates a pressing need to understand its pathogenesis and to identify molecular targets for both diagnosis and therapy of EOC at different stage of disease progression [20], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. In this study, we examined the expression of PIK3CA in vivo and its relationship with the tumor microenvironment in human ovarian cancer. The identification and characterization of the PIK3CA 5′ transcriptional regulatory region (TRR) together with functional validation experiments confirmed that PIK3CA is transcriptionally regulated by the microenvironment, through inflammation and NF-κB. These results offer a new mechanism through which the tumor microenvironment directly activates oncogenic pathways in tumor cells and promotes tumor growth.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Specimens

The specimens used in this study were collected at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Turin, Italy [42]. Tissues were obtained after patients' written consent under a general tissue collection protocol approved by the institution's Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Turin. All tumors were from primary sites, and were collected at the time of debulking surgery from previously untreated patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer. Samples were snap-frozen immediately and stored at −80°C. Specimens were collected under local Institutional review board approval and processed under procedures approved by the HIPAA act.

Cell Culture

Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen). In some experiments cells were incubated in media enriched with recombinant human TNF-α (50 or 100 ng/ml, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) for various times as indicated.

Total RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from 100 to 500 mg of frozen tissue or 1×106 cultured cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). After treatment with RNase-free DNase (Invitrogen), total RNA was reverse-transcribed using Superscript First-Strand Synthesis Kit for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) under conditions defined by the supplier. cDNA was quantified by real-time PCR on the ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Human PIK3CA forward primer: TCA AAG GAT TGG GCA CTT TT, and reverse primer: GCC TCG ACT TGC CTA TTC AG. PCR was performed using Sybr Green PCR Core reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. PCR amplification of the housekeeping gene GAPDH was performed for each sample as control for sample loading and to allow normalization among samples. A standard curve was constructed with PCR-II TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) containing the same inserted fragment and amplified by the real-time PCR.

Tissue Microarray

The tissue microarray was constructed as described previously [43], [44]. In brief, tumors were embedded in paraffin and 5-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin to select representative regions for biopsies. Four core tissue biopsies were obtained from each specimen. The presence of tumor tissue on the arrayed samples was verified on hematoxylin–eosin stained section.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Image Analysis

IHC was performed using the VECTASTAIN ABC Kit as described by the manufacturer (Vector, Burlingame, CA). We used the following primary antibodies (all from BD Pharmingen unless noted otherwise): rabbit anti-human Ki67 (1:200, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA); rabbit anti-human cytokeratin (1:200, DAKO); rabbit anti-human p65 (1:400, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); mouse anti-human p110α (1:250 or 1:50); rat anti-mouse CD31 (1:200); mouse anti-human HIF1Α (1:200); mouse anti-human c-Jun (1:200); rat anti-mouse CD11b (1:200). Antibodies were incubated for 2 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. The immunoreaction was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Vector). Double immunofluorescent staining was performed as previously described [45]. Briefly, sections were sequentially incubated in 5% normal serum; primary antibodies for 2 hrs; and fluorescent labeled secondary antibodies (Vector) for 30 min. Sections were counterstained with DAPI before being inspected under the fluorescent microscope. Images were collected through Cool SNAP Pro color digital camera (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) and staining index was analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 4.1 software (Media Cybernetics).


The ApopTag peroxidase in situ detection kit (Intergen) was used to visualize apoptotic cells in vivo and in vitro. The procedure was performed according to manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, tumor tissue sections were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS, followed by cold ethanol and acetic acid post-fixation. Following incubation with residues of digoxigenin nucleotide and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase for one hr at 37°C, cells were incubated with FITC-labeled anti-digoxigenin antibody.


The mouse PIK3CA cDNA was generously provided by Dr. Roberts (Harvard University). Mammalian expression plasmid pCDNA3 was from Invitrogen. To construct luciferase reporter plasmids, 5′TRRs of the human and mouse PIK3CA were amplified from BAC or genomic DNA using Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and inserted upstream of the luciferase gene in pGL3-Basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Sequences of 5′TRR in all these reporter constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

5′ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (5′RACE)

Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA) and the 5′ RACE system (Invitrogen) was used. The 5′ RACE PCR product was inserted into the TA cloning system (Invitrogen).

Plasmid Transfection

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 3×105 cells/well and grown overnight to ~40% confluence prior to transfection. All plasmids were transfected with FuGENE6 transfection reagent (Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions. To select neomycin-resistant cells, 400 µg/ml neomycin (Invitrogen) was applied. For shRNA experiments, cells were transfected with siRNA expressing pLTsuppressor1.0. In vitro experiments indicated that suppression of PIK3CA mRNA persisted for up to 30 days. All transfection experiments were done in triplicate and repeated at least twice with different DNA isolates.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 3×105 cells/well and grown overnight to 40% confluence prior to transfection. To test the promoter activity of PIK3CA, a total of 0.5 µg reporter construct and 0.01 µg pRL-TK internal control (Promega) were used for each transfection. All transfection experiments were done in triplicate and repeated at least twice with different DNA isolates. Forty-eight hours post-transfection, luciferase analysis was performed on Luminoskan Ascent (Thermo-Labsystems, Waltham, MA) using Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For co-transfection experiments, 1 µg of each pCMV-IκBα or pCMV-IκBαM plasmid (CloneTech, Mountain View, CA) was used.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

Nuclear extract from cells was prepared using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents plus Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) following the manufacturer's protocols and stored at −80°C until used. Recombinant NFκB (p50) was ordered from Promega. 5′-Biotin-labeled DNA oligos containing the wild-type human PIK3CA NFκB binding site (GACGTGGGGGATTTTTCGCGTA), mutated human PIK3CA NFκB binding site (GACGTGGGCGATTTTTCGCGTA), scramble human PIK3CA NFκB binding site (TCAGATAGACGAGACTTGAGTC), wild-type control NFκB binding site (AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGG) [35], mutated control NFκB binding site (AGTTGAGGCGACTTTCCCAGG) were synthesized and the two complementary oligos were annealed to obtain the double-stranded probe. EMSA was performed using LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Pierce). The nuclear extract (or p50) and 30 fmol of labeled probe were incubated in the 10× binding buffer plus 1 µg poly(dI–dC) in 20 µl reaction system at room temperature for 20 min. The entire 20 µl binding reaction was loaded on a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel and run at room temperature in 0.25× TBE at 110 V for 1–1.5 h. The electrophoresed binding reaction was then transferred to BrightStar-Plus positively charged Nylon membrane (Ambion, Austin, TX) in Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 15 V for 30 min and cross-linked in UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) at auto cross-link level for 1 min. Detection of Biotin-labeled DNA probe was performed strictly following the manufacturer's protocol.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

ChIP assay to detect p65 binding on the human PIK3CA promoter was performed using the Upstate ChIP assay kit (Upstate, Charlottesville, VA) following the manufacturer's instruction. Sheared DNA was incubated at 4°C overnight with 2 µg immunoprecipitating rabbit polyclonal IgG antibody to p65 (Santa Cruz) or 2 µg normal rabbit control IgG. Input and chromatin-immunoprecipitated DNA was used as PCR template for detection of p65 binding on the promoter (with primers 5′-GCACCAAGACACTACCTTGAATC-3′ and 5′-CTCTGCAGTCCTTTGACTCACTT-3′) or on the GAPDH promoter (with primers 5′-GACACCATGGGGAAGGTGAA-3′ and 5′-GAGTAGGGACCTCCTGTTTC-3′) using the PCR Core kit (Roche).


A search for potential transcription factor binding sites on the human and mouse PIK3CA 5′TRRs were performed using the program Mat Inspector V2.2 at​_matinspector/matinspector_help.html [46].


Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistics software package (SPSS). All results were expressed as mean ± SD, and p<0.05 was used for significance.


PIK3CA is upregulated in non-proliferating regions in ovarian cancer

To reveal spatial aspects of PIK3CA regulation in tumor in vivo, we first examined the expression of p110α in human ovarian cancer specimens. Interestingly, strong p110α expression was mainly detected in groups of non-proliferating, Ki67− tumor cells (Figure 1 A to C). In these cells, p110α was translocated to the cell membrane (Figure 1 C). In contrast, Ki67+ regions exhibited low expression of p110α, which was mainly located in the cytoplasm, while only few Ki67+ cells exhibited p110α at the cell membrane (Figure 1 B). A tissue microarray was used to further validate this result in human ovarian cancer. In 18 of 30 (60%) tumors, strong p110α expression (and membrane localization) was detected mainly in Ki67− tumor regions, while in the other tumors strong membrane p110α expression was either detected both in both Ki67− and Ki67+ tumor cells (5/30, 16.7%); mainly in Ki67+ tumor cells (3/30,10.0%); or it was undetectable (4/30; 13.3%).


Figure 1. PIK3CA is upregulated in non-proliferating tumor cells in vivo.

A to C. Double immunostaining of p110α (green, FITC) and Ki67 (red, Texas Red) in human ovarian cancer B. High magnification of a region from A with low expression of p110α. p110α is expressed at low levels and localizes to the cytoplasm of Ki67-positive tumor cells. C. High magnification of a region from A with high expression of p110α. p110α is expressed at high levels and localizes to the plasma membrane in Ki67-negative tumor cells. D and E. Immunohistochemical localization of Ki67 allows for clear identification of areas of proliferating and areas of non-proliferating tumor cells in vivo in 2008 ovarian xenograft tumors. E. High magnification of area from D showing the boundary between a proliferating and a non-proliferating region. F to H. Strong expression and cell membrane localization of p110α is only found in Ki67-negative areas. F. Section adjacent to D, stained with antibody against human p110α (1:250 dilution). G. High magnification of area from F showing the boundary between proliferating and non-proliferating region. H. High magnification of area from G showing membrane localization of p110α in the non-proliferating region. I. Immunostaining of human cytokeratin identifies tumor cells in proliferating and non-proliferating areas in the 2008 xenograft model. The line traces the boundary between the two areas, as defined by Ki67 staining in adjacent section (see J). Both proliferating and non-proliferating regions are positive for human cytokeratin (FITC, green), indicating tumor cells. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. J to L. Double p110α and Ki67 immunostaining maps PIK3CA activation in proliferating or non-proliferating areas in 2008 xenograft tumors. J. Ki67 (red, Texas Red) and p110α (FITC, green) exhibit reciprocal expression. K and L. High magnification of proliferating region (I) and non-proliferating region (H) from J.


To further confirm this result, we investigated xenograft tumors generated with the 2008 ovarian cancer cell line. The advantage of this model is that distinct areas of proliferating and resting tumor cells can be clearly identified in vivo by Ki67 staining (Figure 1 D and E) [47]. Similarly to the reciprocal expression observed in the human specimens, strong p110α expression was detected in tumor cells only in Ki67−, non-proliferating regions (Figure 1 F to H). In these areas, p110α was mainly localized to the cell membrane (Figure 1 H). Double staining confirmed that areas expressing p110α were in fact populated by tumor cells, which expressed cytokeratin, an epithelial tumor marker (Figure 1 I to K). With increased primary antibody concentration (from 1:200 to 1:50), weak p110α expression could also be detected in Ki67+ regions, but p110α localized diffusely to the cytoplasm in these areas (Figure 2). Thus, oncogene PIK3CA is significantly upregulated in non-proliferating regions in human ovarian cancer in vivo. These non-proliferating regions always lack blood vessel support and contain numerous necrotic/apoptotic cells as well as rich lymphocyte infiltrating (Figure 3).


Figure 2. p110α is overexpressed in non-proliferating tumor cells in vivo.

A. Immunohistochemical staining of p110α using high primary antibody concentration (1:50) reveals low expression of p110α diffusely in the cytoplasm of tumor cells in Ki67-positive (Ki67+) regions. B and C. High magnification of non-proliferating (B) and proliferating (C) regions from A.


Figure 3. PIK3CA is upregulated in undervascularized tumor areas in vivo.

A. Double immunostaining of CD31 (red, Texas Red) and p110α (green, FITC) in the 2008 xenograft model. Strong p110α staining is mainly detected in tumor regions located distant from capillaries. B. Triple staining of p110α (red, Texas Red), Ki67 (blue, AMCA) and TUNEL (green, FITC) in the 2008 xenograft model.


Identification and characterization of the human and murine PIK3CA promoters

To better understand the regulation signals contributing to upregulation of PIK3CA in cancer, 5′ upstream regulatory sequences of the human PIK3CA gene were identified. 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA end (5′RACE) was employed to identify the transcription start site (TSS) of human PIK3CA (Figure 4A and B). A 125 bp segment of the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) and 2.3 Kbp of the TRR of human PIK3CA were cloned from human bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC, clone number: PR11-245C23). We found that the 5′ upstream regulatory region of human PIK3CA is located approximately 50 Kbp upstream of the translation start codon site (Figure 4A). This region is highly rich in GC (Figure 4B). Mapping RT-PCR further confirmed the TSS of PIK3CA, and a small splicing variant was identified (Figure 4C to E). The murine PIK3CA 5′ upstream regulatory sequence was also cloned by the same method, and was found to be 63.6% identity to the human sequence (Figure 5) and to include a small intron.


Figure 4. Identification and characterization of the human PIK3CA promoters.

A. Illustration of the structure of human PIK3CA gene and its 5′ upstream regulatory region. B. A region highly rich in GC is found in the PIK3CA 5′TRR. C. Illustration of the primers used for mapping RT-PCR of the PIK3CA transcriptional start site (SST). D. Results of mapping RT-PCR. There is no band between the forward primer F1 located upstream of the SST and the reverse primer R located on exon 1 of PIK3CA. The right size bands could be detected between primer F2 or F3 (both located downstream of SST) and reverse primer R. E. A small splicing variant is found in the 5′UTR of human PIK3CA gene, which can also be detected by mapping RT-PCR (primers F2 and R). F. Summarized results of the transcriptional activity of PIK3CA TRR fragments.


Figure 5. Alignment of human and mouse PIK3CA transcriptional regulatory regions.


To further characterize the transcriptional activity of the promoter region, the entire 2.3 Kbp 5′ TRR or incrementally truncated promoter fragments were subcloned together with a 316 or a 150 bp transcript region into the pGL-basic reporter vector to reveal luciferase expression (Figure 4F). Strong transcriptional activity was localized to the −2,340 to −159 bp region by luciferase assay, while transcriptional activity significantly decreased after −159 bp (Figure 4F).

Next, transcription factor binding sites were predicted on human PIK3CA 5′TRR in silico by GenomatiX ( Binding sites for numerous stress-associated transcription factors were found, including NF-κB; hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF); heat-shock protein (HSP); and activator protein 1 (AP1) (Figure 6). Thus, stress signals mediated by these factors might regulate PIK3CA expression in non-proliferating tumor cells in areas of decreased vascularization and increased lymphocyte-infiltrating.


Figure 6. 5′ upstream regulatory sequence of the human PIK3CA gene.


Expression and localization of candidate transcription factors in situ

The expression and localization of three putative regulatory factors that emerged from the above in silico analysis, HIF1α; c-Jun, a member of the AP1 complex; and the p65 subunit of NF-κB, were screened in 2008 xenografts. Because function of these factors requires expression and nuclear translocation, we considered strong expression and nuclear localization indirect evidence of functional activation. Strong nuclear HIF1α expression was seen in patchy cell clusters in Ki67− regions. HIF1α protein was also detected in Ki67+ regions, but it mainly localized to the cytoplasm (Figure 7 A, D and G). c-Jun protein was strictly expressed in the boundaries between Ki67+ and Ki67− regions, where only nuclear staining was detected. Few scattered c-Jun-positive cells could also be detected in Ki67+ regions, but nuclear c-Jun was not seen in Ki67− regions (Figure 7 B, E and H). Strong nuclear localization of NF-κB/p65 protein was seen in the Ki67− regions and in Ki67+ areas adjacent to the Ki67− regions (Figure 7 C, F and I). Interestingly, strongest nuclear NF-κB/p65 was detected adjacent to areas of tissue necrosis (Figure 7 F). This data together with the PIK3CA promoter analysis suggest that HIF1α and NF-κB are implicated in the upregulation of PIK3CA in Ki67− regions in vivo. Consistent with this hypothesis, the hypoxia/HIF pathway has been reported to regulate PIK3CA in cancer cells [48]. Since hypoxic regulation of PIK3CA has been confirmed, we next focused on the regulation of PIK3CA by the NF-κB pathway.


Figure 7. Expression and localization of candidate transcription factors in situ.

A to C. Immunohistochemical staining of candidate transcription factors HIF1α, c-Jun and NF-κB in 2008 xenografts. The line shows the boundary between the Ki67+ p110α-low, and Ki67− p110α-high regions. D to F. High magnification from A to C, respectively, shows expression and nuclear localization of HIF1Α, c-Jun and NF-κB in 2008 xenografts. G to I. Illustration of the localization of the candidate transcription factors HIF1α, c-Jun and NF-κB in the 2008 xenograft model. Large dots represent cytoplasmic localization, while small dots represent nuclear localization. The line represents the boundary between the Ki67+ p110α-low, and Ki67− p110α-high regions.


NF-κB binds to the promoter and upregulates PIK3CA expression

Consistent with an important role of NF-κB in regulating PIK3CA, we found NF-κB binding site consensus sequences in human and mouse PIK3CA 5′TRRs (Figure 8A). The human promoter NF-κB binding site was located at −807 to −786 bp. We tested whether NF-κB regulates the transcriptional activity of human PIK3CA promoter in vitro. NF-κB activation requires release from its inhibitory subunit IκBα, which allows NF-κB translocation to the nucleus [34], [35]. Transient forced expression of wild-type IκBα or mutant IκBα (IκBαM), both of which bind NF-κB and block its translocation to the nucleus, attenuated the transcriptional activity of PIK3CA promoter, as revealed by luciferase assay. Removing the NF-κB binding site from the promoter region abrogated the inhibitory activity of IκBα or IκBαM (Figure 8 B and C).


Figure 8. NF-κB binds to the PIK3CA promoter and activates its expression.

A. Illustration of the predicted NF-κB binding site in human (top) or murine (bottom) PIK3CA promoter region. B. Illustration of the constructs comprising luciferase linked to the human PIK3CA promoter with (Luc-2340/316) or without the NF-κB binding site (Luc-378/316). C. Summary of luciferase activities of Luc-2340/316 and Luc-378/316 co-transfected with pCMV- IκBα or pCMV- IκBαM. D. Gelshift assay using ovarian cancer cell nuclear extract after TNF-α stimulation. Lane 1, NF-κB binding site of wild-type human PIK3CA promoter (wt huPIK3CA NF-κB probe) alone; lanes 2 and 3, wt huPIK3CA NF-κB probe+nuclear extract; lane 4, control NF-κB probe+nuclear extract, lanes 5 and 6, mutated huPIK3CA NF-κB probe+nuclear extract; lane 7, mutated control NF-κB probe+nuclear extract; lanes 8 and 9, scramble huPIK3CA NF-κB probe+nuclear extract. E. Gel shift assay using recombinant NF-κB/p50 protein. Lane 1, wt huPIK3CA NF-κB probe alone; lanes 2 and 3, wt huPIK3CA NF-κB probe+p50; lane 4, mutated huPIK3CA NF-κB probe alone; lanes 5 and 6, mutated huPIK3CA NF-κB probe+p50; lane 7, control NF-κB probe alone; lanes 8 and 9, control NF-κB probe+p50.


The predicted NF-κB binding sequence in the human PIK3CA promoter was further tested using gel shift assay. Nuclear proteins from 2008 ovarian cancer cell line treated with TNF-α were able to shift (bind) oligonucleotide sequences containing the predicted NF-κB binding site of human PIK3CA promoter, but were not able to shift either mutant or mock oligonucleotide sequences (Figure 8 D). In addition, recombinant NF-κB/p50 protein was able to shift the oligonucleotide sequences containing the predicted NF-κB binding sites, confirming their presence in the human PIK3CA promoter (Figure 8 E). Finally, the presence of NF-κB binding site in the PIK3CA promoter was confirmed by chromosome immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP).

Inflammation might regulate PIK3CA expression via NF-κB pathway

During tumor growth, metabolic/ischemic stress induces tumor cell death, recruiting inflammatory cells including macrophages. These release proinflammatory cytokines which activate the NF-κB pathway [25], [33], [34], [35]. We mapped the distribution of necrosis, tumor-infiltrating macrophages and activation of NF-κB in the 2008 xenograft model. Morphologic necrosis was detected predominantly in Ki67− p110α+ regions, often located in their center (Figure 9 A). Brisk infiltration of CD11b+ macrophages, which produce pro-inflammation cytokines such as TNF-α, was found in association with areas of necrosis (Figure 9 B to D).


Figure 9. TNF-α regulates PIK3CA expression via NF-κB pathway.

A. H&E staining of 2008 tumor reveals a prominent area of necrosis (N). B and C. Immunohistochemical staining of murine CD11b reveals macrophage infiltrate in a 2008 xenograft. CD11b+ cells infiltrate tumors in Ki67-negative regions in proximity of necrosis. C. High magnification from B. D. Double immunostaining of CD11b (green, FITC) and Ki67 (red, Texas Red) reveals CD11b+ macrophages mainly in non-proliferating Ki67-negative regions. E. ChIP analysis of NF-κB binding to the endogenous PIK3CA promoter. The arrows indicate the positions of the primers flanking −803 NF-κB binding site that were used in the ChIP assays. Cells were treated with TNF-α for 0, 30, or 90 min, and then chromatin protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked using formaldehyde. The purified nucleoprotein complexes were immunoprecipitated with p65 antibody or non-immune IgG and amplified by PCR. F. PIK3CA mRNA expression levels after stimulation with pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α. G. Illustration of the transcriptional regulation of PIK3CA by NF-κB.


TNF-α one of major cytokines produced by tumor-associated macrophages, is known to activate NF-κB. Because murine TNF-α is 69% identical and 85% homologous to human TNF-α, and it is known to bind to the human TNF-α receptor with the same affinity and to produce similar biologic effects on human cells as human TNF-α [49], [50], [51], we hypothesized that macrophage-derived TNF-α could be in part responsible for the observed NF-κB activation and PIK3CA upregulation in 2008 tumors cells in vivo. First, we tested whether TNF-α increases NF-κB complex binding to the PIK3CA promoter using the ChIP assay. Antibody to NF-κB/p65 was able to precipitate the PIK3CA promoter sequence and this was increased in a time-dependent manner by TNF-α treatment, which increases NF-κB translocation to the nucleus (Figure 9E). Thus, the PIK3CA promoter contains a functional NF-κB binding site and can be activated by NF-κB. Lastly, we tested whether TNF-α increased PIK3CA mRNA expression in ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro. A significant upregulation of PIK3CA was found in two ovarian cancer cell lines (Figure 9F). Taken together, our results indicate that inflammation triggered in response to tumor cell death might one of the mechanisms that upregulate PIK3CA expression via NF-κB in ovarian cancer cells in vivo.


PI-3 kinases are intracellular lipid kinases implicated in the regulation of cell metabolism, survival and proliferation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. In this study, we characterized the expression and transcriptional regulation of PIK3CA in human ovarian caner in vivo. We reported the spatial dissociation between tumor cell proliferation and PIK3CA upregulation, and a specialized functional role of PIK3CA in non-proliferating tumor cells in vivo. The identification and characterization for the first time of the PIK3CA 5′ upstream regulatory region confirmed that PIK3CA is an important mediator of tumor cell response to stress in vivo and enabled the identification of a molecular link between inflammation and tumor growth mediated by NF-κB and p110α.

Based on in silico prediction and in situ scanning, at least two stress signaling pathways appeared to play important roles in PIK3CA regulation in cancer, namely HIF and NF-κB. HIF binding sites were identified in the PIK3CA promoter region and strong nuclear HIF staining was detected in the areas where tumor cells upregulate PIK3CA in vivo. This is in agreement with recent evidence that PIK3CA is upregulated by hypoxia in renal carcinoma cell lines [48]. The second regulatory pathway mediated by NF-κB was characterized in this study. We confirmed NF-κB binding sites on the PIK3CA promoter by gel shift; documented binding of NF-κB through ChIP; and showed increased binding of NF-κB to the PIK3CA promoter by TNF-α. The use of the 2008 xenograft model enabled us to confirm that activation of NF-κB coincides with p110α upregulation in non-proliferating tumor cells in vivo.

NF-κB plays a critical role in inflammation-driven tumor formation, growth, and progression [25], [30], [31], [32], 33, 34, 35. In the classical pathway, NF-κB activation is triggered in response to proinflammatory cytokines that lead to phosphorylation-induced IκB degradation and liberation of NF-κB p50:RelA or p50:c-Rel dimers [25], [35]. NF-κB activation promotes transcription of diverse genes encoding inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and cell adhesion molecules, which can promote tumor growth. Importantly, NF-κB activation may also promote tumor cell survival directly through inhibition of apoptosis or necrosis [34]. The present data offers the evidence that NF-κB directly upregulates PIK3CA and provides a novel pathway through which NF-κB activation can promote cancer cell survival during stress. Interestingly, activation of the PI-3 kinase/Akt/mTOR pathway has been previously shown to suppress autophagy and direct apoptosis-resistant tumor cells under stress to necrotic cell death, which results in inflammation and accelerated tumor growth [52].

The present results provide novel in vivo evidence to support the concept that tumor-host interactions contribute to oncogene activation and tumor growth. Based on these findings and previously reported evidence, we propose a novel model to interpret the function of PIK3CA in solid tumors and its regulation by the tumor microenvironment (Figure 9G). During tumor growth, PIK3CA may be expressed at low levels and p110α localizes mainly to the cytoplasm in cancer cells proliferating in proximity to vessels in a metabolically lush microenvironment. This “physiologic” level of PIK3CA expression serves as an intracellular mediator maintaining tumor cell proliferation and growth by responding to extracellular growth factors. As tumor cells outgrow nutrient support, cancer cells are subjected to metabolic/ischemic stress ultimately leading to cell death. The paracrine factors released by stressed cells as well as infiltrating-leucocytes can edit the microenvironment towards inflammation. Our data suggest that the inflammatory microenvironment can edit back the tumor cells through activation of the NF-κB/PIK3CA pathway, with multifaceted results that promote survival.

In summary, we demonstrated a specialized upregulation of PIK3CA oncogene in non-proliferating tumor cells induced by the microenvironment through inflammation. Non-proliferating tumor cells may contribute to resistance to current cancer therapeutics and could be an important source for tumor recurrence. Isoform-specific targeting of PIK3CA by small molecule inhibitors or siRNA can significantly block tumor growth and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells [53]. Thus, PIK3CA-targeted cancer therapy might be a rational approach to target non-proliferating tumor cells and enhance the effect of chemotherapy or radiation in combinatorial therapy. Furthermore, based on our results, PIK3CA targeting might be a rational approach to combine with anti-inflammatory cancer therapy.


We thank Drs. Steven Johnson and Kang-Shen Yao (University of Pennsylvania) for the human ovarian cancer cells; and Dr. Thomas M. Roberts (Harvard University) for the mouse PIK3CA cDNA plasmid.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LZ GC. Performed the experiments: LZ NY JH Sl CL AO AB. Analyzed the data: SK LZ NY AG JG KH JH GC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DK RB. Wrote the paper: LZ NY GC.


  1. 1. Bader AG, Kang S, Zhao L, Vogt PK (2005) Oncogenic PI3K deregulates transcription and translation. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 921–929.
  2. 2. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC (2006) The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet 7: 606–619.
  3. 3. Katso R, Okkenhaug K, Ahmadi K, White S, Timms J, et al. (2001) Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases: implications for development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17: 615–675.
  4. 4. Parsons R (2005) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors are a triple threat to ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 7965–7966.
  5. 5. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL (2002) The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 489–501.
  6. 6. Hu L, Hofmann J, Lu Y, Mills GB, Jaffe RB (2002) Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase increases efficacy of paclitaxel in in vitro and in vivo ovarian cancer models. Cancer Res 62: 1087–1092.
  7. 7. Testa JR, Tsichlis PN (2005) AKT signaling in normal and malignant cells. Oncogene 24: 7391–7393.
  8. 8. Vanhaesebroeck B, Leevers SJ, Ahmadi K, Timms J, Katso R, et al. (2001) Synthesis and function of 3-phosphorylated inositol lipids. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 535–602.
  9. 9. Sugimoto Y, Whitman M, Cantley LC, Erikson RL (1984) Evidence that the Rous sarcoma virus transforming gene product phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol and diacylglycerol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 2117–2121.
  10. 10. Whitman M, Kaplan DR, Schaffhausen B, Cantley L, Roberts TM (1985) Association of phosphatidylinositol kinase activity with polyoma middle-T competent for transformation. Nature 315: 239–242.
  11. 11. Chang HW, Aoki M, Fruman D, Auger KR, Bellacosa A, et al. (1997) Transformation of chicken cells by the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase. Science 276: 1848–1850.
  12. 12. Campbell IG, Russell SE, Choong DY, Montgomery KG, Ciavarella ML, et al. (2004) Mutation of the PIK3CA gene in ovarian and breast cancer. Cancer Res 64: 7678–7681.
  13. 13. Karakas B, Bachman KE, Park BH (2006) Mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene in human cancers. Br J Cancer 94: 455–459.
  14. 14. Levine DA, Bogomolniy F, Yee CJ, Lash A, Barakat RR, et al. (2005) Frequent mutation of the PIK3CA gene in ovarian and breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res 11: 2875–2878.
  15. 15. Nakayama K, Nakayama N, Kurman RJ, Cope L, Pohl G, et al. (2006) Sequence mutations and amplification of PIK3CA and AKT2 genes in purified ovarian serous neoplasms. Cancer Biol Ther 5: 779–785.
  16. 16. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304: 554.
  17. 17. Shayesteh L, Lu Y, Kuo WL, Baldocchi R, Godfrey T, et al. (1999) PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 21: 99–102.
  18. 18. Zhang L, Yang N, Katsaros D, Huang W, Park JW, et al. (2003) The oncogene phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase catalytic subunit alpha promotes angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res 63: 4225–4231.
  19. 19. Wenham RM, Lancaster JM, Berchuck A (2002) Molecular aspects of ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16: 483–497.
  20. 20. Mok SC, Elias KM, Wong KK, Ho K, Bonome T, et al. (2007) Biomarker discovery in epithelial ovarian cancer by genomic approaches. Adv Cancer Res 96: 1–22.
  21. 21. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100: 57–70.
  22. 22. Joyce JA (2005) Therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 7: 513–520.
  23. 23. Balkwill F, Charles KA, Mantovani A (2005) Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease. Cancer Cell 7: 211–217.
  24. 24. Balkwill F, Coussens LM (2004) Cancer: an inflammatory link. Nature 431: 405–406.
  25. 25. Vakkila J, Lotze MT (2004) Inflammation and necrosis promote tumour growth. Nat Rev Immunol 4: 641–648.
  26. 26. Mantovani A, Schioppa T, Porta C, Allavena P, Sica A (2006) Role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor progression and invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25: 315–322.
  27. 27. Lin EY, Pollard JW (2004) Role of infiltrated leucocytes in tumour growth and spread. Br J Cancer 90: 2053–2058.
  28. 28. Nozawa H, Chiu C, Hanahan D (2006) Infiltrating neutrophils mediate the initial angiogenic switch in a mouse model of multistage carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12493–12498.
  29. 29. Zijlstra A, Seandel M, Kupriyanova TA, Partridge JJ, Madsen MA, et al. (2006) Proangiogenic role of neutrophil-like inflammatory heterophils during neovascularization induced by growth factors and human tumor cells. Blood 107: 317–327.
  30. 30. Luo JL, Maeda S, Hsu LC, Yagita H, Karin M (2004) Inhibition of NF-kappaB in cancer cells converts inflammation- induced tumor growth mediated by TNFalpha to TRAIL-mediated tumor regression. Cancer Cell 6: 297–305.
  31. 31. Greten FR, Eckmann L, Greten TF, Park JM, Li ZW, et al. (2004) IKKbeta links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 118: 285–296.
  32. 32. Pikarsky E, Porat RM, Stein I, Abramovitch R, Amit S, et al. (2004) NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 431: 461–466.
  33. 33. Coussens LM, Werb Z (2002) Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420: 860–867.
  34. 34. Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li ZW (2002) NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 301–310.
  35. 35. Lenardo MJ, Baltimore D (1989) NF-kappa B: a pleiotropic mediator of inducible and tissue-specific gene control. Cell 58: 227–229.
  36. 36. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, et al. (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 43–66.
  37. 37. Ozols RF (2000) Management of advanced ovarian cancer consensus summary. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Consensus Faculty. Semin Oncol 27: 47–49.
  38. 38. Berchuck A, Brewer M, Rodriguez G, Campbell I (2003) Discussion: Ovarian Cancer Prevention. Gynecologic Oncology 88: S67–S70.
  39. 39. Ozols RF, Bookman MA, Connolly DC, Daly MB, Godwin AK, et al. (2004) Focus on epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell 5: 19–24.
  40. 40. Agarwal R, Kaye SB (2003) Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 502–516.
  41. 41. Bast RC Jr, Brewer M, Zou C, Hernandez MA, Daley M, et al. (2007) Prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer: mission impossible? Recent Results Cancer Res 174: 91–100.
  42. 42. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, et al. (2003) Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 348: 203–213.
  43. 43. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, et al. (1998) Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med 4: 844–847.
  44. 44. Lassus H, Leminen A, Lundin J, Lehtovirta P, Butzow R (2003) Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. Gynecol Oncol 91: 504–512.
  45. 45. Zhang L, Yang N, Garcia JR, Mohamed A, Benencia F, et al. (2002) Generation of a syngeneic mouse model to study the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian carcinoma. Am J Pathol 161: 2295–2309.
  46. 46. Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, Klocke B, Haltmeier M, et al. (2005) MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21: 2933–2942.
  47. 47. Zhang L, Yang N, Huang J, Buckanovich RJ, Liang S, et al. (2005) Transcriptional coactivator Drosophila eyes absent homologue 2 is up-regulated in epithelial ovarian cancer and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res 65: 925–932.
  48. 48. Hu CJ, Wang LY, Chodosh LA, Keith B, Simon MC (2003) Differential roles of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and HIF-2alpha in hypoxic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 9361–9374.
  49. 49. Smith RA, Kirstein M, Fiers W, Baglioni C (1986) Species specificity of human and murine tumor necrosis factor. A comparative study of tumor necrosis factor receptors. J Biol Chem 261: 14871–14874.
  50. 50. Kull FC Jr, Jacobs S, Cuatrecasas P (1985) Cellular receptor for 125I-labeled tumor necrosis factor: specific binding, affinity labeling, and relationship to sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 5756–5760.
  51. 51. Vercammen D, Vandenabeele P, Declercq W, Van de Craen M, Grooten J, et al. (1995) Cytotoxicity in L929 murine fibrosarcoma cells after triggering of transfected human p75 tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor is mediated by endogenous murine TNF. Cytokine 7: 463–470.
  52. 52. Degenhardt K, Mathew R, Beaudoin B, Bray K, Anderson D, et al. (2006) Autophagy promotes tumor cell survival and restricts necrosis, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 10: 51–64.
  53. 53. Zhang L, Yang N, Liang S, Barchetti A, Vezzani C, et al. (2004) RNA interference: a potential strategy for isoform-specific phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase targeted therapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 3: 1283–1289.