Figures
Abstract
Background
The extent to which patients with COPD are receiving indicated treatment with medications to improve lung function and recent trends in the use of these medications is not well documented in the United States. The objective of this study was to examine trends in prescription medications for COPD among adults in the United States from 1999 to 2010.
Methods
We performed a trend analysis using data from up to 1426 participants aged ≥20 years with self-reported COPD from six national surveys (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2010).
Results
During 2009–2010, the age-adjusted percentage of participants who used any kind of medication was 44.2%. Also during 2009–2010, the most commonly used medications were short-acting agents (36.0%), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (18.3%), and LABAs (16.7%). The use of long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs) (p for trend <0.001), ICS (p for trend = 0.013) increased significantly over the 12-year period. Furthermore, the use of tiotropium increased rapidly during this period (p for trend <0.001). For the years 2005–2010, the use of LABAs, ICS and tiotropium increased with age. Compared with whites, Mexican Americans were less likely to use short-acting agents, LABAs, ICS, tiotropium, and any kind of COPD medication. Among participants aged 20–79 years with spirometry measurements during 2007–2010, the use of any medication was reported by 19.0% of those with a moderate/severe obstructive impairment and by 72.6% of those with self-reported COPD and any obstructive impairment.
Citation: Ford ES, Mannino DM, Wheaton AG, Presley-Cantrell L, Liu Y, Giles WH, et al. (2014) Trends in the Use, Sociodemographic Correlates, and Undertreatment of Prescription Medications for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States from 1999 to 2010. PLoS ONE 9(4): e95305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095305
Editor: Henrik Watz, Pulmonary Research Institute at LungClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany
Received: November 12, 2013; Accepted: March 25, 2014; Published: April 21, 2014
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: Dr Mannino has the following potential conflicts of interest and financial disclosures to declare: Received honoraria/consulting fees and served on speaker bureaus for GlaxoSmithKline plc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., AstraZeneca PLC, Forest Laboratories Inc., and Creative Educational Concepts. Furthermore, he has received royalties from Up-to-Date. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Because of the chronic and often progressive nature of COPD, treatment is paramount in reducing symptoms, improving quality of life and health status, enhancing exercise capacity, slowing deterioration of lung function, limiting exacerbations, and prolonging the life of patients with COPD [1], [2]. Management of these patients encompasses several critical elements which include 1) reducing or preferably eliminating exposure to the offending agent that caused COPD; 2) prescribing medications as indicated; 3) use of oxygen when indicated; 4) pulmonary rehabilitation; and 5) reducing exacerbations. Treatment options for prescription medications directed at the underlying airflow limitation have evolved over time; whereas the mainstay of treatment several decades ago included primarily methylxanthines and short-acting beta-2 agonists, treatment has gradually shifted to emphasize increasingly the use of long-acting beta-2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
As the therapeutic armamentarium of medications used to treat COPD has expanded, guidelines concerning the use of these agents have also changed [1], [3]. Consequently, a current perspective on the use of medications used to treat COPD in the United States is valuable in gauging the concordance between recommended guidelines and indicators of clinical practice. Therefore, the principal objective of this study was to examine the trend in the usage of prescription medications used to treat the airflow limitation in patient with COPD in national samples of adults with COPD. As secondary objectives, we sought to examine sociodemographic determinants of the usage of these medications and to determine the percentage of participants with an airflow limitation who were receiving treatment with medications for their condition.
Methods
Ethics Statement
The present study used publically-available data and was exempt from human subjects review.
The analyses in this study were conducted using six 2-year cycles of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) NHANES 1999–2010. In each of these cycles, a stratified multistage selection process was used to select a national probability sample. Participants who agreed to participate were interviewed in their homes and offered an opportunity to attend an examination in the mobile examination center. Those who agreed were asked to complete additional questionnaires, to undergo various examinations, and to provide a blood sample in the mobile examination center. Response rates for the interview ranged from 78% to 84%, and response rates for the examination ranged from 75% to 80%. Details about the surveys may be found elsewhere [4], [5].
A participant was defined with self-reported COPD if the survey participant reported having been told that he or she had chronic bronchitis and still had it or if he or she reported that he or she had emphysema. Participants who reported not having been told that they had either condition were defined as not having COPD.
During 2007–2010, participants in NHANES aged 6–79 years were offered an opportunity to have spirometry. Participants were asked to provide three acceptable maneuvers on Ohio 822/827 dry-rolling seal volume spirometers [6]. Detailed protocols for the spirometric examination can be found elsewhere [6], [7]. Only results from quality spirometric efforts were used.
Equations derived from earlier NHANES III data (1988–1994) were used to calculate the predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) [8]. We applied the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification of COPD severity that is based on post-bronchodilator spirometric results to pre-bronchodilator testing [2]. In addition, we also defined a category of restrictive impairment (FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FVC <80% predicted) for some analyses. In addition, some analyses were conducted using FEV1 predicted of <60% and 60–<80% in accordance with the 2011 American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society (ACP/ACCP/ATS/ERS) recommendations [1].
Participants who responded affirmatively were then asked to report the medications that they were using and, when available, to show the medication containers to the interviewer who could record up to 20 medications. The following major groups of medications were established: any short acting medication (albuterol, fenolterol, levalbuterol, metaprotenerol, pirbuterol, terbutaline, ipratropium, fenolterol plus ipratropium, and albuterol plus ipratropium), long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) (salmeterol, formoterol, and arformoterol whether used separately or as part of a combination product), ICS (beclomethasone, budenoside, flunisolide, fluticasone, and triamcinolone whether used separately or as part of a combination product), short-acting anticholinergic agents (ipratropium), long-acting anticholinergic agents (tiotropium), methylxanthines (aminophylline and theophylline), and any of the aforementioned medications.
Participants who responded affirmatively to one or more of these questions were considered to have evidence of respiratory symptoms. Because the question about shortness of breath was asked only of participants aged ≥40 years, analyses involving respiratory symptoms were limited to this age group.
To examine the sociodemographic variation in prescribed medication use, we included the following covariates: age, gender, self-reported race or ethnicity (white, African American, Mexican American, and other), and educational level (less than 12 years, high school graduate or equivalent, education beyond high school).
The analyses were limited to participants aged ≥20 years for analyses involving adults with self-reported COPD in 1999–2010, to participants aged 20–79 years in 2007–2010 for analyses involving spirometric data, and to participants aged 40–79 years for analyses involving respiratory symptoms. Age-adjustment to the projected year 2000 U.S. population was done with the direct method using three age groups (20–39 years, 40–59 years, and ≥60 years). Tests for linear trend were conducted using polynomial orthogonal contrasts. In addition, we examined tests for linear trend by calculating prevalence ratios adjusted for age, gender, race or ethnicity, and educational status using log-binomial models. To examine the most recent sociodemographic correlates of medication use, we combined data for the years 2005–2010 to increase sample size. We used SAS for data processing and SUDAAN to account for the complex sampling design of the survey and produce estimates (means and percentages) that are representative of the civilian noninstitutionalized population in the United States. Sample sizes provided in the text and tables represent unweighted numbers.
Results
The numbers of participants aged ≥20 years who were interviewed for the six consecutive cycles were 4880, 5411, 5041, 4979, 5935, and 6218, and the numbers of participants who reported having been told that they had COPD were 213 (weighted percentage 4.2%), 208 (3.5%), 234 (4.3%), 212 (4.4%), 314 (4.3%), and 245 (3.3%). Medication status could be ascertained for all but two participants. The sociodemographic breakdown for these participants with COPD is shown in Table 1. Based on aggregated data for the 12-year period, adults with self-reported COPD were older, more likely to be women, to be white, to be less educated, and to be a current smoker than adults without COPD (Table 2).
Medication Use among Participants with Self-reported COPD: NHANES 1999 to 2010
During 2009–2010, an unadjusted 53.2% (SE 4.9) of participants reported no medications used in the management of COPD, 21.1% (SE 3.4) reported a medication from one group, 16.9% (SE 2.9) reported medications from 2 groups, and 8.7% (SE 3.3) reported medications from 3 or more groups. Averaged over all 12 years, 7.6% (SE 0.9) of participants used medications from 3 or more groups.
During 2009–2010, an age-adjusted 44.2% of participants used any type of prescription medication used to treat COPD (Table 3). In descending order of reported use were short-acting agents (36.0%) consisting primarily short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) (31.3%), ICS whether alone or in combination with a LABA (18.3%), LABAs whether alone or in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid (16.7%), tiotropium (10.5%), and methylxanthines (<2.0%). The trend in the use of any medication increased significantly during the study period. The relatively high use of medications during 1999–2000 was a function of the high use of short-acting agents. Significant increases were noted for the use of LABAs, ICS, tiotropium, and any medication. The data also suggested that the use of ICS as single agents decreased whereas the use of combination products of LABAs and corticosteroids increased (data not shown).
Even after combining six years of data, the numbers of participants in the 2005–2010 time period who reported using various types of medications was limited resulting in reduced power to examine sociodemographic correlates of medication use (Table 4). The use of ICS and tiotropium increased among successive age groups in 2005–2010. Compared with whites, Mexican Americans were less likely to use short-acting agents, LABAs, ICS, tiotropium, and any kind of COPD medication (Table 4).
After combining 12 years of data for participants aged ≥40 years with self-reported COPD, 87.1% (SE 1.5) of participants who did not use medications to treat COPD and 95.2% (SE 1.3) of those who used such medications reported having one or more of the following symptoms: cough, phlegm, wheezing, and shortness of breath.
Medication Use among Participants with an Obstructive Impairment: NHANES 2007 to 2010
Of the 11289 participants aged 20–79 years who were interviewed in 2007–2010, 10981 attended the mobile examination center and 9047 had values for FEV1 and FVC, allowing their lung function status to be established for 7887 participants with adequate spirometric efforts: 580 participants with a mild obstructive impairment, 428 with a moderate obstructive impairment, and 63 with a severe obstructive impairment. Because of the small number of participants with a severe obstructive impairment, they were combined with participants who had a moderate obstructive impairment.
The prevalence of self-reported COPD was 3.7% and that of any obstructive impairment was 13.4% (7.6% mild obstructive impairment, 5.8% moderate or worse obstructive impairment). Of adults with any obstructive impairment based on spirometry, 7.5% had self-reported COPD, and among adults with self-reported COPD, 34.8% had evidence of an obstructive impairment. The use of any COPD medication was reported by 7.3% (SE 2.2) of participants with a mild obstructive impairment and 19.0% (SE 2.7) of participants with a moderate/severe obstructive impairment (Table 5). Among those with a moderate/severe obstructive impairment, the most commonly reported medications were short-acting agents (15.5%), followed by ICS (9.0%), and LABAs (6.5%). Tiotropium and methylxanthines were used by small percentages of participants (≤2%).
Over 70% of participants with an obstructive impairment and with self-reported COPD reported using any COPD medication, the majority of which were short-acting agents (Table 6). In comparison, almost 30% of adults without an obstructive impairment but with self-reported COPD used a medication.
In an attempt to assess the percentage of participants with COPD who reported using medications consistent with the 2011 ACP/ACCP/ATS/ERS recommendations, we stratified medications use by self-reported COPD status, presence or absence of respiratory symptoms, and percent FEV1 predicted (Table 7). Although the use of long-acting medications (31.5% among participants with an FEV1 predicted 60% to 80% and 53.8% of participants with an FEV1 predicted <60%) and any medications (46.2% among participants with an FEV1 predicted 60% to 80% and 72.8% of participants with an FEV1 predicted <60%) increased as FEV1% predicted decreased among participants with self-reported COPD and symptoms, substantial percentages of these participants did not report using such medications.
Discussion
Our analyses highlight several findings of interest. First, the types of medications that adults with self-reported COPD reported using changed substantially from 1999 to 2010. In particular, the use of LABAs, inhaled corticosteroids, and tiotropium increased sharply. Second, Mexican American adults with self-reported COPD were less likely to report using the different medications that we examined than white adults. Third, many adults with COPD were not receiving potentially beneficial treatment.
Although important changes in medications to treat COPD have occurred during the last decade, the trends in the use of these medications in the United States have not been adequately documented in the medical literature. The Food and Drug Administration approved several medications during the past decade including the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone in 2000, tiotropium in 2004, and the combination of formoterol and budesonide in 2006. The classes of all of these agents showed strong increases during the study period. A previous analysis of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1995 to 2004 showed that prescriptions for oral corticosteroids in men and methylxanthines in men and women had decreased but prescriptions for anticholinergic agents had increased [9]. As in other studies, we found that short-acting agents, principally SABAs, were the most commonly used medications by 2009–2010 [10], [11]. In our study, the next most frequently used medications were combination products containing LABAs and a corticosteroid (13.7%) followed by ICS (8.0%).
Our analysis of sociodemographic correlates of medication use indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the use of these medications between white and African American adults. However, Mexican American adults with COPD were less likely than whites to use major groups of medications. Because little information about health disparities involving treatment for COPD in Hispanic populations appears to have been published, our findings require confirmation. Reduced access to health care, language barriers, and cultural beliefs are possible factors that can affect treatment for COPD among Mexican Americans [12].
In our study, considerable percentages of adults with self-reported COPD or with COPD defined by spirometry did not divulge having medications used to treat COPD. Because of the cross-sectional nature of the survey, the presence of symptoms and use of medications were collected at a single point in time, precluding establishing the temporal sequence of symptom onset and instituted treatment. Other studies have also found low rates of pharmacotherapy among patients with COPD [13]–[15]. In the United States, an analysis of the PharMetrics database from 2004–2005 showed that 59.1% of commercial patients and 66.0% of Medicare patients with COPD were not prescribed any COPD medications [15]. In a Japanese study, 31% of patients with moderate to severe COPD did not receive adequate treatment (Takahashi 2003) [13]. In a study from Denmark, only 42% of patients who were identified as having COPD in a population study were receiving treatment in the year following their examination (Ingebrigtsen 2013) [14].
Raising awareness of COPD in the general population and clinical community is a theme that echoes with regularity in the medical literature and is critical to bringing patients with COPD into the medical system so that appropriate treatment of their condition can be initiated [16]–[18]. High levels of undiagnosed COPD or misdiagnosis of the disease likely account for some of the suboptimal rates of treatment among people with COPD [19]. In our study, we observed that a high percentage of adults whose spirometric examination indicated an obstructive impairment did not report having COPD. Although in a survey of British general practitioners, levels of confidence in their ability to diagnose and manage COPD were quite high [20], estimates suggest that about half of patients with COPD may not be diagnosed [21], [22].
Once diagnosed, other factors may influence the rate of medication use by people with diagnosed COPD shown in this and other studies. First, many people with COPD may not have received treatment as recommended by prevailing guidelines because physicians may be unaware or unfamiliar with guidelines or because some may not follow the guidelines [23], [24]. Although the reasons why physicians may not follow prevailing guidelines are not entirely clear, many aspects of guidelines were developed on the basis of key clinical trials that often excluded participants with comorbidities or other characteristics relevant to daily clinical practice [25]. A literature review of potential barriers to physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines in general identified several barriers: familiarity, agreement, self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, ability to overcome inertia of previous practice, and absence of external barriers to perform recommendations [26]. When presented with several COPD case studies, however, many practitioners tended to gravitate towards a diagnosis of cardiac rather than pulmonary origin [20]. By increasing the detection rate of COPD, which would presumably result in increased treatment, the treatment rate among all people with COPD would be increased. Other studies specific to adherence to COPD guidelines noted that agreement with recommendations, low self-efficacy, perceived outcome expectancy, resource availability, and time constraints were barriers to physician adherence to guidelines for COPD [27], [28].
Empowering patients with COPD may boost the percentage of patients who are receiving appropriate treatment for COPD and contribute to improving the course of their disease. Public health strategies to empower patients with COPD [29] complemented by clinical strategies founded in the chronic care model that seek to enhance patient self-management may serve to increase the percentages of adults with COPD on appropriate treatment [30].
Adherence to prescribed medications is suboptimal among patients with COPD [15]. Patient-associated factors that may impede adherence to prescribed treatments may include cost, complexity of treatment regime, presence of comorbidities requiring treatment, side effects, adverse events, treatment fatigue, and other innate factors. Understanding the issues is a prerequisite to developing sound interventions to maximize adherence.
In the PharMetrics database, adherence varied from 52.3% for short-acting anticholinergic agents to 82.2% for leukotriene modifiers among commercial patients and from 51.8% for short-acting anticholinergic agents to 85.2% for leukotriene modifiers among Medicare patients [15]. An analysis of another administrative database in the United States showed that adherence as measured by the proportion of days covered was highest for medications that are supposed to be used once per day compared to medications that are to be taken twice, three times, and four times per day [31]. Furthermore, adherence declined steadily from 3 months post initiation to 12 months post initiation in each category of frequency of use.
Our results are subject to several limitations. First, the small number of survey participants with COPD limited our ability to stratify the data or to examine specific medications in most instances. Second, a number of participants had a reversible airflow limitation because we used prebronchodilator spirometry results. Third, some proportion of patients with self-reported COPD do not meet spirometric criteria for obstructed airflow. For the years 2007–2010, 34.8% of participants with self-reported COPD had an obstructive impairment, and thus, the level of undertreatment of people with self-reported COPD may not be as substantial as it appears. If the proportion of adults with self-reported COPD who did not have an obstructive impairment based on spirometry remained reasonably constant over time, however, the trends in medication usage likely reflect the direction of actual trends in the population. Fourth, we did not have access to data that would have allowed us to establish the reasons why certain medications were prescribed or the route of administration. Knowing the reason for use is especially critical for medications with a wide range of uses such as oral corticosteroids.
In conclusion, substantial changes in the use of medications to treat airflow limitations among adults with COPD occurred from 1999–2000 to 2009–2010, and a low percentage of adults with self-reported COPD reported having medications used to treat COPD. Given the demonstrated benefits of treatment, improving treatment is a high public health priority as envisioned in the Public Health Strategic Framework for COPD Prevention [32]. Furthermore, these findings provide important information to guide national education efforts such as the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s COPD: Learn More, Breathe Better campaign [33]. Such efforts could enhance the ability of health professionals to increase the delivery of optimal treatment of persons diagnosed with COPD to optimum treatment.
Acknowledgments
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: EF. Analyzed the data: EF AW. Wrote the paper: EF DM AW LP YL WG JB.
References
- 1. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Weinberger SE, Hanania NA, Criner G, et al. (2011) Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. Ann Intern Med 155: 179–191.
- 2.
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (2011) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. Revised 2011. Available: http://www.goldcopd.org/. Accessed 6 March 2014.
- 3. Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, Sherif K, Wilt TJ, et al. (2007) Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 147: 633–638.
- 4.
U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–94. Vital & Health Statistics, Series 1, No 32 DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 94–I308.
- 5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm. Accessed 18 March 2011.
- 6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Spirometry - 1st Test & 2nd Test Bronchodilator Studies. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2007-2008/SPX_E.htm. Accessed 6 March 2014.
- 7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Spirometry - 1st Test & 2nd Test Bronchodilator Studies. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2009-2010/SPX_F.htm. Accessed 6 March 2014.
- 8. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB (1999) Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 179–187.
- 9. Suh DC, Lau H, Pokras SM, Choi IS, Valiyeva E (2008) Sex differences in ambulatory visits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, based on the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1995 to 2004. Respir Care 53: 1461–1469.
- 10. Sarc I, Jeric T, Ziherl K, Suskovic S, Kosnik M, et al. (2011) Adherence to treatment guidelines and long-term survival in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Eval Clin Pract 17: 737–743.
- 11. Nair KV, Belletti DA, Doyle JJ, Allen RR, McQueen RB, et al. (2011) Understanding barriers to medication adherence in the hypertensive population by evaluating responses to a telephone survey. Patient Prefer Adherence 5: 195–206.
- 12. Brehm JM, Celedon JC (2008) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hispanics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177: 473–478.
- 13. Takahashi T, Ichinose M, Inoue H, Shirato K, Hattori T, et al. (2003) Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of COPD in primary care settings. Respirology 8: 504–508.
- 14. Ingebrigtsen TS, Marott JL, Vestbo J, Hallas J, Nordestgaard BG, et al. (2013) Characteristics of undertreatment in COPD in the general population. Chest 144: 1811–1818.
- 15. Make B, Dutro MP, Paulose-Ram R, Marton JP, Mapel DW (2012) Undertreatment of COPD: a retrospective analysis of US managed care and Medicare patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 7: 1–9.
- 16. Voelkel NF (2000) Raising awareness of COPD in primary care. Chest 117: 372S–375S.
- 17. Zielinski J, Bednarek M, Gorecka D, Viegi G, Hurd SS, et al. (2006) Increasing COPD awareness. Eur Respir J 27: 833–852.
- 18. Decramer M, Brusselle G, Buffels J, Corhay JL, De Backer W, et al. (2013) COPD awareness survey: do Belgian pulmonary physicians comply with the GOLD guidelines 2010? Acta Clin Belg 68: 325–340.
- 19. Jones R, Ostrem A (2011) Optimising pharmacological maintenance treatment for COPD in primary care. Prim Care Respir J 20: 33–45.
- 20. Halpin DM, O’Reilly JF, Connellan S, Rudolf M (2007) Confidence and understanding among general practitioners and practice nurses in the UK about diagnosis and management of COPD. Respir Med 101: 2378–2385.
- 21. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Ford ES, Redd SC (2002) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease surveillance–United States, 1971–2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 51: 1–16.
- 22. Halbert RJ, Natoli JL, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist AS, et al. (2006) Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 28: 523–532.
- 23. Barr RG, Celli BR, Martinez FJ, Ries AL, Rennard SI, et al. (2005) Physician and patient perceptions in COPD: the COPD Resource Network Needs Assessment Survey. Am J Med 118: 1415.
- 24. Foster JA, Yawn BP, Maziar A, Jenkins T, Rennard SI, et al. (2007) Enhancing COPD management in primary care settings. MedGenMed 9: 24.
- 25. Rabe KF, Wedzicha JA (2011) Controversies in treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 378: 1038–1047.
- 26. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, et al. (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282: 1458–1465.
- 27. Salinas GD, Williamson JC, Kalhan R, Thomashow B, Scheckermann JL, et al. (2011) Barriers to adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guidelines by primary care physicians. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 6: 171–9.
- 28. Perez X, Wisnivesky JP, Lurslurchachai L, Kleinman LC, Kronish IM (2012) Barriers to adherence to COPD guidelines among primary care providers. Respir Med 106: 374–381.
- 29.
Colorado COPD Coalition, American Lung Association of Colorado (2007) A Strategic Plan to Address Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Colorado. Available: http://www.lung.org/associations/states/colorado/assets/pdfs/colorado-copd-strategic-plan.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2014.
- 30. Fromer L (2011) Implementing chronic care for COPD: planned visits, care coordination, and patient empowerment for improved outcomes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 6: 605–614.
- 31. Toy EL, Beaulieu NU, McHale JM, Welland TR, Plauschinat CA, et al. (2011) Treatment of COPD: relationships between daily dosing frequency, adherence, resource use, and costs. Respir Med 105: 435–441.
- 32.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Public Health Strategic Framework for COPD Prevention. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/copd/pdfs/Framework_for_COPD_Prevention.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2014.
- 33.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2012) COPD Learn More Breathe Better® Campaign. Available: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/lung/copd/lmbb-campaign/. Accessed 6 March 2014.