Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Oral Leucine Supplementation Is Sensed by the Brain but neither Reduces Food Intake nor Induces an Anorectic Pattern of Gene Expression in the Hypothalamus

  • Thais T. Zampieri,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    ⨯
  • João A. B. Pedroso,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Isadora C. Furigo,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Julio Tirapegui,

    Affiliation Department of Food Science and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Jose Donato Jr.

    jdonato@icb.usp.br

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    ⨯

Abstract

Leucine activates the intracellular mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, and hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Although central infusion of leucine reduces food intake, it is still uncertain whether oral leucine supplementation is able to affect the hypothalamic circuits that control energy balance. We observed increased phosphorylation of p70s6k in the mouse hypothalamus after an acute oral gavage of leucine. We then assessed whether acute oral gavage of leucine induces the activation of neurons in several hypothalamic nuclei and in the brainstem. Leucine did not induce the expression of Fos in hypothalamic nuclei, but it increased the number of Fos-immunoreactive neurons in the area postrema. In addition, oral gavage of leucine acutely increased the 24 h food intake of mice. Nonetheless, chronic leucine supplementation in the drinking water did not change the food intake and the weight gain of ob/ob mice and of wild-type mice consuming a low- or a high-fat diet. We assessed the hypothalamic gene expression and observed that leucine supplementation increased the expression of enzymes (BCAT1, BCAT2 and BCKDK) that metabolize branched-chain amino acids. Despite these effects, leucine supplementation did not induce an anorectic pattern of gene expression in the hypothalamus. In conclusion, our data show that the brain is able to sense oral leucine intake. However, the food intake is not modified by chronic oral leucine supplementation. These results question the possible efficacy of leucine supplementation as an appetite suppressant to treat obesity.

Citation: Zampieri TT, Pedroso JAB, Furigo IC, Tirapegui J, Donato J Jr (2013) Oral Leucine Supplementation Is Sensed by the Brain but neither Reduces Food Intake nor Induces an Anorectic Pattern of Gene Expression in the Hypothalamus. PLoS ONE 8(12): e84094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094

Editor: Miguel López, University of Santiago de Compostela School of Medicine - CIMUS, Spain

Received: October 18, 2013; Accepted: November 15, 2013; Published: December 13, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Zampieri et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This study was financed by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP-Brazil, 2010/18086-0 and 2012/15517-6) and the International Brain Research Organization (IBRO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The regulation of the energy balance and food intake relies on the ability of the central nervous system (CNS) to receive and process information about the nutritional status of the organism. This information is conveyed by hormones, such as leptin, insulin and ghrelin. In addition, variations in the circulating levels of nutrients also convey important information to the CNS about the fed/fasting state [1,2]. It has long been known that specific populations of neurons can sense glucose levels. Glucose-sensing neurons play a key role in the control of glucose homeostasis, energy balance and counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia [3-5]. There have also been reports indicating that the brain has a lipid-sensing ability that is critical for the control of energy balance and insulin sensitivity [6,7]. However, despite the fact that amino acids are indispensable macronutrients as substrates for the synthesis of proteins and other molecules, much less is known about the ability of the brain to sense their circulating levels. In fact, the body seems to detect variations in the concentrations of amino acids because systemic administration of amino acids can stimulate whole-body protein synthesis [8,9]. Among all amino acids, it appears that the branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) leucine is of particular importance in conveying the level of amino acid availability to cells because leucine is the most potent amino acid that activates the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) intracellular signaling pathway, which is critical for initiating the protein translation process [10-16].

The availability of leucine has effects beyond the control of protein synthesis, and some studies have also demonstrated that supplementation with leucine induces changes in energy balance and adiposity. Thus, it has been speculated that leucine supplementation could be used for the treatment and prevention of obesity [17,18]. However, previously obtained results have been controversial. Leucine supplementation decreases adiposity in food-restricted rats [19] and during aging [20]. However, while some studies have shown that leucine supplementation reduces diet-induced obesity in rodents [21-25], others did not find any significant effects on adiposity with leucine supplementation [26,27]. In humans, the combined supplementation of leucine and pyridoxine (vitamin B6) increased the fat oxidation of overweight subjects [28]. However, 3 months of leucine supplementation did not change the weight, the body composition and the energy intake and macronutrient composition, calculated from the dietary intake records, of healthy elderly men [29].

It is unclear how leucine is able to influence the energy balance. Cota et al. [30] showed that hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. As leucine is a natural activator of the mTOR signaling pathway, it is plausible to hypothesize that leucine supplementation recruits mTOR signaling in the hypothalamus, which in turn causes a reduction in food intake. However, the vast majority of the studies that assessed the consequences of leucine supplementation did not find any reduction in food intake, even those studies that observed decreases in body fat mass [19-21,24-27,31-37]. On the other hand, when leucine is directly administered in the CNS through an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) cannula, it does indeed cause a reduction in food intake [22,30,38,39]. Considering that oral, instead of central, administration of leucine is the only feasible and physiological way to supplement leucine in people, it is imperative to clarify whether oral leucine supplementation is in fact able to affect hypothalamic circuitries that regulate food intake. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to employ acute and chronic paradigms of oral leucine supplementation to assess possible changes in food intake and activation of hypothalamic components that control energy balance.

Results

Experiment 1

Acute oral administration of leucine induces phosphorylation of p70S6K in the hypothalamus.

Acute oral administration of leucine causes activation of p70S6K in the skeletal muscle [10,11], the liver [12,40] and white adipose tissue [14,41]. In the hypothalamus, p70S6K phosphorylation can be induced by i.c.v. administration of leucine [22,30]. However, it is still uncertain whether orally administered leucine is able to recruit this signaling pathway in the hypothalamus. We observed that orally administered leucine increased the phosphorylation of p70S6K in the hypothalamus of mice (Figure 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Acute oral leucine administration induced phosphorylation of p70S6K in the hypothalamus.

Bar graphs showing the quantification of the phosphorylation of p70S6K in the hypothalamus of mice that received oral gavage of water (CON group, n = 9) or leucine solution (LEU group, n = 9). The data were normalized to the expression of α-actinin. *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from the CON group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g001

Experiment 2

Acute oral administration of leucine induces the expression of Fos protein in the area postrema.

The expression of Fos protein is a well-established acute marker of activated neurons [42]. Therefore, we assessed whether oral leucine administration is able to activate neurons in several nuclei of the hypothalamus and brainstem related to the regulation of the energy balance (Table 1). In the hypothalamus, the number of neurons expressing Fos-immunoreactivity (Fos-ir) in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH, Figure 2A-B), the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH, Figure 2C-D), the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (VMH, Figure 2C-D), the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA, Figure 2C-D) and the dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (DMH, Figure 2C-D) were similar between the leucine and control groups (Table 1). In the brainstem, we observed that the area postrema (AP) of leucine-treated mice showed a higher number of Fos-expressing neurons than the control group (Figure 2E-F and Table 1). No difference in the expression of Fos-ir in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) was observed between groups (Figure 2E-F and Table 1).

AreaControl GroupLeucine GroupP
PVH6.1 ± 1.68.0 ± 1.40.3913
ARH9.4 ± 2.29.9 ± 2.40.8806
VMH10.4 ± 2.212.8 ± 2.30.4669
LHA24.9 ± 3.323.7 ± 2.70.7811
DMH22.8 ± 1.418.8 ± 3.90.3246
NTS3.7 ± 0.83.4 ± 0.80.8216
AP1.5 ± 0.411.6 ± 2.6*0.0008

Table 1. Number of neurons expressing Fos immunoreactivity in nuclei of the hypothalamus and brainstem of mice from control and leucine groups (n = 9-10 per group).

* significantly different (P < 0.05) from control group (Student’s t-test). AP, area postrema; ARH, arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus; DMH, dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus; LHA, lateral hypothalamic area; NTS, nucleus of the solitary tract; PVH, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus; VMH, ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus.
CSV
Download CSV
thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Acute oral leucine increased the expression of Fos in the area postrema.

A-F. Brightfield photomicrographs of mouse brain sections showing the Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-ir) in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH; A-B), the mediobasal hypothalamus (C-D), the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS; E-F) and the area postrema (AP; E-F) of mice from control group (A, C, E; n = 10) and leucine group (B, D, F; n = 9). Arrowheads indicate neurons expressing Fos-ir in the AP. The boxes shown in E and F exhibit a higher magnification image in the AP. Abbreviations: 3v, third ventricle; ARH, arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus; cc, central channel; DMH, dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus; f, fornix; LHA, lateral hypothalamic area; VMH, ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. Scale Bar: A-B = 50 µm; C-D = 100 µm; E-F = 50 µm (higher magnification boxes = 25 µm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g002

Experiment 3

Oral administration of leucine acutely increased the food intake of mice.

The previous results suggested that the brain is responsive to oral leucine supplementation. To determine whether acute oral administration of leucine produces changes in the food intake we daily habituated 20 single-housed mice to receive 0.5 mL of water through gavage for one week. Latter, mice received a gavage containing leucine for two days. Their food intake and weight gain were compared to that observed after receiving only water. Surprisingly, we observed an increased food intake in the days when the mice received leucine in comparison with the control (water) days (Figure 3A). No changes in the weight gain (data not shown) or body weight (Figure 3B) were observed among the studied days.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Oral Leucine supplementation acutely increased food intake.

A. Oral gavage of a leucine solution increased the 24 h food intake (Day 3 and Day 4) compared to the days when the animals received gavage of water (Day 1 and Day 2). B. No changes in body weight were observed among the experimental days. *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from D1 and D2 (gavage of water).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g003

Experiment 4

Chronic leucine supplementation in the drinking water does not change the food intake of genetically obese (ob/ob) mice.

We assessed the food and water intake of ob/ob mice for 20 days. In the first 10 days, the mice received water to drink. In the remaining days, they were supplemented with leucine in the drinking water. Each mouse acted as its own control by comparing their food and water intake before and during the supplementation period. The food intake of ob/ob mice remained unaltered during the supplementation period compared to the food intake assessed when the mice received only water to drink (Figure 4A-B). Water intake also was not affected by leucine supplementation (Figure 4C). Similarly, weight gain was not influenced by leucine supplementation (Control: 0.28 ± 0.02 g/day; Leucine: 0.27 ± 0.03 g/day; P = 0.7273). Based on the amount of leucine obtained through the diet and water, total leucine intake during the supplementation period was 2.7-fold (0.32 ± 0.01 g/day) higher than the basal period (0.12 ± 0.01 g/day).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Chronic leucine supplementation did not change the food intake and water ingestion of ob/ob mice.

The food intake and water ingestion of ob/ob mice (n = 7) were assessed for 20 consecutive days. During the first 10 days, the mice received water to drink (H2O, white bar), followed by 10 days of leucine supplementation in the drinking water (Leucine, black bar).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g004

Experiment 5

Chronic leucine supplementation in the drinking water does not change the food intake of wild-type mice receiving a low- or a high-fat diet.

Now we decided to study the effects of leucine supplementation in the drinking water of wild-type mice receiving either a low- or a high-fat diet (HFD). Initially, a group of mice received a HFD for 2 months while another group was kept in their regular low-fat diet. Then, half of the mice in each group received leucine supplementation in the drinking water for 6 weeks, whereas the other half had water to drink. The consumption of the HFD caused a marked increase in the body weight (Figure 5A) and adiposity (Figure 5B-C) compared to mice consuming the regular low-fat diet. Oral leucine supplementation did not change the body weight of mice receiving either a low- or a high-fat diet (Figure 5A). In accordance, no changes in the mass of subcutaneous, perigonadal and retroperitoneal fat pads were observed between control and leucine groups (Figure 5B-C). We assessed the food intake all over the experiment and we failed to find significant differences in the calorie intake comparing control and leucine groups in both diets (Figure 5 D-E,G-H). Water intake remained unchanged in leucine-supplemented mice consuming a low-fat diet (Figure 5F). However, leucine supplementation in the drinking water reduced the amount of liquid ingested by mice consuming the HFD (Figure 5I). We assessed serum corticosterone levels to determine whether chronic leucine supplementation in the drinking water caused a stress response (Figure S1). No changes were observed between control and leucine groups, either in mice consuming low- or high-fat diets (Figure S1). In addition, corticosterone levels were 4 to 7 fold lower in mice of the control and leucine groups compared to animals that were subjected to conditions that increase corticosterone secretion such as psychosocial stress or prolonged fasting (Figure S1). For the mice consuming the low-fat diet, leucine supplementation in the drinking water increased total leucine intake 3-fold (0.23 ± 0.01 g/day) compared to the control group (0.08 ± 0.00 g/day). In the mice consuming the HFD, leucine intake increased approximately 2.3-fold in the supplemented group (0.10 ± 0.00 g/day) compared to the control HFD group (0.05 ± 0.00 g/day).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. Body weight, adiposity and food intake were not affected by chronic leucine supplementation.

Body weight (A), mass of subcutaneous (SC), perigonadal (PG) and retroperitoneal (RP) fat pads (B-C), food intake (D-E, G-H) and water consumption (F, I) in mice receiving low- and high-fat diets of control and leucine groups (n = 9-10 per group). *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from control group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g005

Lack of evidence that leucine supplementation induces an anorectic pattern of gene expression in the hypothalamus, despite significant effects on the expression of enzymes that metabolize BCAA

The mice from the previous experiment were euthanized, and their hypothalami collected for gene expression analysis. Initially, we assessed whether leucine supplementation in the drinking water was able to affect the expression of genes that encode the enzymes that metabolize the BCAA. The BCAT1 gene, which encodes the cytosolic form of the enzyme branched-chain amino acid transaminase and is highly expressed in the brain [43], and the BCAT2 gene, which encodes the mitochondrial form of the enzyme branched-chain amino acid transaminase, showed no changes in mice consuming a low-fat diet, but a higher expression in leucine-supplemented animals consuming the HFD (Figure 6A-B). The branched-chain α-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex (BCKDK) showed an increased expression in the leucine-supplemented groups, regardless of diet (Figure 6A-B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. Hypothalamic mRNA expression of genes involved in the BCAA metabolism and energy balance regulation.

Gene expression was assessed in mice receiving a low-fat diet (A, n = 10 per group) or a high-fat diet (B, n = 9-10 per group). *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from control group. †, P = 0.0532 versus control group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.g006

Previous studies have demonstrated that central leucine administration causes a rapamycin-dependent anorectic behavior, possibly through its influence on the hypothalamic circuitry that regulates energy balance [22,30,38,39,44]. However, much less is known about how chronic oral leucine supplementation can affect the pattern of gene expression in the hypothalamus. Therefore, we assessed the expression of several genes involved in the regulation of food intake. Chronic leucine supplementation in mice consuming the HFD caused an increased mRNA expression of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH, Figure 6B). No changes in mRNA expression of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) were observed with leucine treatment (Figure 6A-B).

Discussion

Leucine supplementation has received special attention because of its possible effects on the regulation of energy balance and food intake [13,17,18,30]. Herein, we studied chronic oral supplementation of leucine in genetically obese mice and in wild-type mice receiving either low- or high-fat diets. Overall, we failed to observe any significant reduction on food intake or in the induction of an anorectic pattern of gene expression in the hypothalamus. However, in an acute paradigm of leucine supplementation, leucine seems to increase food intake. In addition, we collected several pieces of evidence showing that the brain is in fact able to sense the increased ingestion of leucine, by increasing the hypothalamic phosphorylation of p70S6K and the activation of neurons in the AP, and by changing the expression of several genes in the hypothalamus.

Our group and others have studied leucine supplementation in rodents in distinct metabolic situations, such as food restriction [19,31,32], aging [13,20,34,45,46], protein-restricted diets [33,47], high-caloric diets [21-27,35,37,48,49] and genetically obese models [22,50]. In the vast majority of these studies, oral leucine supplementation, provided either in the diet or in the drinking water, caused no changes in food intake [13,14,19-21,24-27,31-37,45-50], although there are exceptions [22,23,38,51]. In contrast, studies that aimed to assess possible effects of leucine on the CNS and therefore infused leucine directly into the brain have consistently shown reductions in food intake [22,30,38,39,44]. Why, then, does oral leucine supplementation usually result in different effects on regulation of food intake compared to centrally injected leucine? By infusing leucine directly into the brain, it bypasses the blood-brain barrier and other “natural filters” (i.e., glia cells, tanycytes, etc.) that protect the brain from toxic agents or strong variations in substances in the blood. Therefore, it is not surprising that central leucine administration produces a much stronger effect on brain function compared to paradigms that provide leucine through the diet or drinking water. However, the fact that oral leucine supplementation in most of the studies cannot recapitulate the reduction in food intake observed after centrally infused leucine suggests that these presumable effects of leucine must be revised or examined with caution. It is important to consider that if leucine becomes a therapeutic supplement to treat obesity or other diseases in human beings, just as it has been tested [28], leucine would be provided in an oral form. Therefore, it would be more useful for future studies that assess the effects of leucine on the regulation of food intake focus primarily on oral forms of supplementation.

There is evidence that leucine-rich diets may induce taste aversion in rodents, at least temporarily [22,38]. Besides, in excess leucine can be toxic [52]. To avoid possible interference of leucine in the food palatability, we decided to supplement leucine in the drinking water, which resulted in no changes in food intake either in genetically obese mice or in wild-type mice. The limitation is the relatively low solubility of leucine in water and the fact that leucine supplementation will be linked with water ingestion. Despite that, we were able to increase daily leucine intake by up to 3-fold compared to control animals. It is worth mentioning that the increase in leucine intake attained by providing it in the drinking water was higher or equivalent to the supplementation dose used in several previously published studies that showed significant effects of leucine [19,21,24-26,31,32,35,36,47,49,50].

The studies that found changes in food intake mostly provided leucine supplementation through the diet [22,23,38]. In one study, leucine-induced taste aversion was observed only on the first day of supplementation [22]. However, Koch et al. [38] found that dietary leucine supplementation reduced the food intake by inducing taste aversion, whereas leucine supplementation in the drinking water caused no effects on food intake. In addition, only i.c.v. administration of leucine reduced food intake, whereas gavage, subcutaneous or intraperitoneal infusions caused no changes in feeding behavior [38]. Because dietary leucine supplementation may have this confounder, it is also important that future studies perform the required controls to rule out possible effects of leucine on food intake through influencing taste aversion or food palatability.

Previous studies found that the central infusion of leucine causes p70S6K phosphorylation in brain areas related to the regulation of food intake, including the ARH, PVH, and NTS, but not in the VMH, zona incerta, hippocampus and cerebral cortex [22,30,44]. In addition, the infusion of leucine in the mediobasal hypothalamus not only induces Fos expression in the ARH but also in areas outside the injection site, such as the PVH and NTS [39]. We failed to detect significant changes in Fos expression in the PVH, ARH or NTS. Another study [53] identified amino acids that are able to induce Fos expression in the hypothalamus. The authors found that the nonessential amino acid asparagine induces Fos expression in orexin neurons, which are involved in the regulation of food intake, whereas leucine does not [53]. We observed a significant increase in Fos expression only in the AP. The AP is considered an important area for chemoreception, both in detecting toxins and controlling nausea and vomiting. Lesions of AP prevent taste-aversion conditioning after administration of lithium chloride [54,55] or other substances [56]. Therefore, the AP may be involved in the brain´s ability to sense leucine intake.

It has long been known that variations in leucine availability induce changes in the expression and/or activity of enzymes that metabolize BCAA [57-60]. Much less is known about the influence of leucine supplementation on the hypothalamic expression of these enzymes. Some authors suggest that the high expression of the cytosolic form of BCAT in the brain plays a role in the synthesis of amino acid neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate and GABA) by transferring the nitrogen group from BCAA to neurotransmitter precursors [61]. Furthermore, cytosolic BCAT may also be involved in the ability of the brain to sense the availability of amino acids [61]. Regarding our results, we observed an increased expression of BCAT1, BCAT2 and BCKDK in the groups supplemented with leucine, particularly in mice consuming the HFD. The increased expression of the enzymes that metabolize BCAA in leucine-supplemented animals is in accordance with the fact that the body must prevent excessive increases in circulating leucine levels, lest it cause toxic effects. BCAT2-knockout mice display very high levels of BCAA and a lean phenotype which is associated with elevated energy expenditure [62]. Interestingly, BCAT2-knockout mice have increased food intake, most likely as a compensatory mechanism for the higher energy expenditure [62]. In accordance, other studies also observed increased energy expenditure in animals supplemented with leucine [21,25], sometimes associated with increased food intake [21]. So, it is possible that the increased food intake observed after acute administration of leucine in our study was caused by compensatory mechanisms seeking to reestablish the energy balance. Leucine supplementation did not affect the expression of genes involved in the regulation of the energy balance in mice consuming a low-fat diet. However, we observed an increased expression of the orexigenic NPY in diet-induced obese mice, at the same time they exhibited an increased expression of the anorexigenic CRH. The reasons for this particular pattern of hypothalamic gene expression are unknown, but it may also reflect an attempt of the organism to defend the energy homeostasis by balancing orexigenic and anorexigenic neuronal pathways. In the long-term, the resulting consequence may be the lack of changes in food intake as observed in our study. Lastly, it is important to consider that leucine supplementation may produce significant effects on body metabolism independently of changes in the food intake. These effects can be observed in studies that found reductions in adiposity in animals supplemented with leucine, even in the absence of changes in food intake [19-21,24,25,31,37].

In summary, three sets of experiments using different methods (activation of intracellular pathways, induction of Fos protein and analysis of gene expression) demonstrated that the brain possesses mechanisms allowing it to detect changes in the availability of leucine from oral intake. Thus, leucine, as well as glucose and lipids [3-7], can be sensed by the brain. We also suggest that the AP is a putative area involved in the brain’s leucine chemoreception. Despite the fact the brain is able to sense leucine, chronic oral leucine supplementation (in the drinking water) does not produce changes in the food intake, nor does it cause an anorectic pattern of gene expression in the hypothalamus. Although future studies should directly assess the consequences of leucine supplementation in humans, our results question the possible efficacy of leucine supplementation as an appetite suppressant to treat obesity.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The mice used in the experiments were maintained under standard conditions of light (12 h light/dark cycle; lights on 8:00 am), temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and relative humidity (55 ± 15%). All animal procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, and were performed according to the ethical guidelines adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation.

Experiment 1

Single-housed 10-week-old C57BL/6 male mice were daily habituated to receive gavage for one week. Then, mice were fasted overnight and at 9:00 am received an oral gavage administration of 0.5 mL of water (control group, n = 9) or 0.15 м l-leucine (Synth, Brazil) solution (leucine group, n = 9). The chosen dose of l-leucine (0.15 м or 1.967% wt/vol) is near to its limit of solubility in water. Previous studies used this same dose in the drinking water [26] or slightly lower amounts (1.5-1.7% wt/vol) [21,24,25,35,38]. The mice were euthanized by decapitation 90 min after the oral gavage, and the hypothalami were quickly collected for western blot analysis. To dissect the hypothalamus, we defined its limits as follows: rostro-caudal, 1 mm anterior to the optic chiasm and immediately posterior to the mammillary bodies; lateral, defined by the optic tract; and superior, the dorsal limit of the third ventricle.

Experiment 2

Single-housed 10-week-old C57BL/6 mice were habituated daily to handling and to receiving oral gavage for one week to minimize unspecific Fos expression. After that, mice were fasted for 4 h, followed by an oral gavage administration of 0.5 mL of water (control group, n = 10) or 0.15 м L-leucine solution (leucine group, n = 9) at 1:00 pm. After 3 h, mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused transcardially with saline followed by a 4% formaldehyde solution (150 mL each mouse). Brains were collected and post-fixed in the same fixative for 2 h and cryoprotected overnight at 4 °C in 0.1 м phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, containing 20% sucrose. Brains were cut (30-µm sections) in the frontal plane using a freezing microtome. Four series were collected in antifreeze solution and stored at -20 °C. The time chosen to perfuse the mice after the oral gavage of leucine to detect Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-ir) was based on previous studies [53].

Experiment 3

Single-housed 10-week-old C57BL/6 male mice (n = 20) were habituated daily to handling and to receiving oral gavage (0.5 mL of water) for one week. Then, we assessed for 4 consecutive days their 24 h food intake and body weight. In the first 2 days, mice received an oral gavage administration of 0.5 mL of water. In the next 2 days, they received an oral gavage administration of 0.15 м L-leucine solution. The gavage took place 3 hours before lights off. We assessed whether leucine supplementation acutely affect the food intake, weight gain and body weight of mice in comparison with the days the mice received water.

Experiment 4

Ten-week-old C57BL/6 leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice (n = 7; initial body weight: 39.6 ± 0.5 g) were acclimated to single housing for 1 week. After that, their food intake and water ingestion were assessed daily for 20 consecutive days. In the first 10 days of the experiment, the mice received water to drink. In the remaining days, the contents of the drinking bottle were replaced with a 0.15 м L-leucine solution. During the entire experiment, the mice had ad libitum access to a regular rodent chow diet (Quimtia, Nuvilab CR-1, Brazil). The objective of this experiment was to assess whether leucine supplementation changes the food intake in comparison to the data collected when the mice received only water to drink. The purpose in using the same animal as reference (control) was to minimize interindividual variability in assessing the effects of leucine on food intake. Therefore, each mouse acted as its own control.

Experiment 5

Eight-week-old C57BL/6 male mice (n = 39) were distributed into two groups according to diet: low-fat regular rodent chow diet (Quimtia, Nuvilab CR-1, Brazil; 2.99 kcal/g; 9.4% calories from fat) or a high-fat diet (PragSoluções, Brazil; 5.31 kcal/g, 58% calories from fat). After 2 months, each group was redistributed into two more groups: control and leucine groups. The mice were kept on their original diets, but the leucine groups received a 0.15 м leucine solution in the drinking water, whereas the control groups had water to drink. During the experiment, the mice had ad libitum access to their experimental diets and drinking bottle and we assessed their food intake, water ingestion and body weight 3 times per week. After 6 weeks of supplementation, the mice were fasted for 4 h and euthanized by decapitation. The hypothalami were dissected as previously described and frozen at -80 °C for gene expression analysis. Serum corticosterone levels were assessed by ELISA (Cayman Chemical).

Western Blot

Immediately after collection, the hypothalami were homogenized in RIPA buffer (Sigma) containing a cocktail of protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1:100, Sigma), then resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE gel and finally transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking the membrane with 5% BSA, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C using commercially available antibodies (phospho-p70S6K, Cell Signaling, #9205, 1:1,000; and α-actinin, Santa Cruz, H-300, 1:1,000). Next, we incubated the membrane for 45 min in IRDye 800CW secondary antibody (1:10,000, Li-COR). Proteins were visualized and analyzed using the Li-COR Odyssey system (Li-COR) and phospho-p70S6K expression was normalized to α-actinin expression.

Immunohistochemistry

The immunohistochemistry protocol followed has been previously described [63]. Briefly, brain sections were rinsed in 0.02 м potassium PBS, pH 7.4 (KPBS), followed by a pretreatment with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. After rinses in KPBS, sections were blocked in 3% normal donkey serum for 1 h, followed by incubation in anti-Fos polyclonal primary antibody raised in rabbit (1:20,000, Ab5, Millipore) for 48 h. Subsequently, sections were incubated for 1 h in biotin-conjugated IgG donkey anti-rabbit (1:1,000, Jackson Laboratories) and for 1 h in avidin-biotin complex (1:500, Vector Labs). The sections were then submitted to a 3-5 min immunoperoxidase reaction with 0.03% hydrogen peroxide dissolved in 0.1 м acetate buffer, pH 6.0, using diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Sigma) and 0.5% nickel sulfate as chromogens. Sections were mounted onto gelatin-coated slides, dried overnight, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene and coverslipped with DPX Mountant for histology (Sigma-Aldrich). Fos-ir was analyzed in the PVH, ARH, VMH, LHA, DMH, NTS and AP. Nuclear boundaries were determined using a mouse brain atlas as reference [64]. We counted the number of cells expressing a dark-brown/black nuclear staining in one side of a representative rostral-to-caudal level of each area. A researcher with experience in counting Fos immunoreactivity and blinded to the experimental groups was designed to do all the counting. The ImageJ Cell Counter tool was used to mark each counted cell avoiding double counting. Photomicrographs were acquired with a Zeiss Axiocam HRc camera adapted to a Zeiss Axioimager A1 microscope (Zeiss, Munich, Germany). Images were digitalized using the Axiovision software (Zeiss). Photoshop CS5 (Adobe) image-editing software was used to combine photomicrographs into plates. Only sharpness, contrast and brightness were adjusted.

Relative Gene Expression (qPCR)

Total RNA were extracted with TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Assessment of RNA quantity and quality was performed with an Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (Biotek®). Total RNA was incubated in DNase I RNase-free (Roche Applied Science). Reverse transcription was performed with 2 µg of total RNA with SuperScript® II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random primers p(dN)6 (Roche Applied Science). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems®) on duplicates of each cDNA and optimized using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix or TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (both from Applied Biosystems®). Specific primers were designed for each target gene according to sequences taken from GenBank or the literature (Table S1). Melt curve analysis was conducted to validate the specificity of the primers. Relative quantification of mRNA was calculated by 2-ΔΔCt [65]. Data were normalized to β-actin expression and reported as fold changes compared to values obtained from the control group (set at 1.0).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of the data from Experiments 1, 2 and 5, we used the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. In Experiment 3, data were compared using the repeated measures ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls posttest. In Experiment 4, data were compared using the paired two-tailed Student’s t-test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant in all analyses. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Serum corticosterone levels. Corticosterone levels of control and leucine groups (n = 8-10 per group) were compared to values obtained from mice that were subjected to psychosocial stress (3 days in individual cages followed by regrouping for 30 min; n = 4) or prolonged fasting (n = 8). *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from control and leucine groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.s001

(TIF)

Table S1.

Primer sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084094.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Lucas C. Pantaleão, José Luiz dos Santos and Ana Maria P. Campos for the technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TTZ JD. Performed the experiments: TTZ JABP ICF JD. Analyzed the data: TTZ JABP JD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JT. Wrote the manuscript: JD.

References

  1. 1. Myers MG Jr., Olson DP (2012) Central nervous system control of metabolism. Nature 491: 357-363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11705. PubMed: 23151578.
  2. 2. Williams KW, Elmquist JK (2012) From neuroanatomy to behavior: central integration of peripheral signals regulating feeding behavior. Nat Neurosci 15: 1350-1355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3217. PubMed: 23007190.
  3. 3. Parton LE, Ye CP, Coppari R, Enriori PJ, Choi B et al. (2007) Glucose sensing by POMC neurons regulates glucose homeostasis and is impaired in obesity. Nature 449: 228-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06098. PubMed: 17728716.
  4. 4. Levin BE, Dunn-Meynell AA, Routh VH (1999) Brain glucose sensing and body energy homeostasis: role in obesity and diabetes. Am J Physiol 276: R1223-R1231. PubMed: 10233011.
  5. 5. Miki T, Liss B, Minami K, Shiuchi T, Saraya A et al. (2001) ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the hypothalamus are essential for the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. Nat Neurosci 4: 507-512. PubMed: 11319559.
  6. 6. Lam TK, Pocai A, Gutierrez-Juarez R, Obici S, Bryan J et al. (2005) Hypothalamic sensing of circulating fatty acids is required for glucose homeostasis. Nat Med 11: 320-327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1201. PubMed: 15735652.
  7. 7. Yue Jessica TY, Lam Tony KT (2012) Lipid Sensing and Insulin Resistance in the Brain. Cell Metab 15: 646-655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.013. PubMed: 22560217.
  8. 8. Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Vary TC, Jefferson LS (2000) Orally administered leucine stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle of postabsorptive rats in association with increased eIF4F formation. J Nutr 130: 139-145. PubMed: 10720160.
  9. 9. Garlick PJ (2005) The role of leucine in the regulation of protein metabolism. J Nutr 135: 1553S-1556S. PubMed: 15930468.
  10. 10. Anthony JC, Yoshizawa F, Anthony TG, Vary TC, Jefferson LS et al. (2000) Leucine stimulates translation initiation in skeletal muscle of postabsorptive rats via a rapamycin-sensitive pathway. J Nutr 130: 2413-2419. PubMed: 11015466.
  11. 11. Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS (2001) Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr 131: 856S-860S. PubMed: 11238774.
  12. 12. Anthony TG, Anthony JC, Yoshizawa F, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS (2001) Oral administration of leucine stimulates ribosomal protein mRNA translation but not global rates of protein synthesis in the liver of rats. J Nutr 131: 1171-1176. PubMed: 11285321.
  13. 13. Dardevet D, Sornet C, Bayle G, Prugnaud J, Pouyet C et al. (2002) Postprandial stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in old rats can be restored by a leucine-supplemented meal. J Nutr 132: 95-100. PubMed: 11773514.
  14. 14. Lynch CJ, Hutson SM, Patson BJ, Vaval A, Vary TC (2002) Tissue-specific effects of chronic dietary leucine and norleucine supplementation on protein synthesis in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E824-E835. PubMed: 12217901.
  15. 15. Lynch CJ, Halle B, Fujii H, Vary TC, Wallin R et al. (2003) Potential role of leucine metabolism in the leucine-signaling pathway involving mTOR. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285: E854-E863. PubMed: 12812918.
  16. 16. Han Jung M, Jeong Seung J, Park Min C, Kim G, Kwon Nam H et al. (2012) Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Is an Intracellular Leucine Sensor for the mTORC1-Signaling Pathway. Cell 149: 410-424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.044. PubMed: 22424946.
  17. 17. Layman DK (2003) The role of leucine in weight loss diets and glucose homeostasis. J Nutr 133: 261S-267S. PubMed: 12514305.
  18. 18. Layman DK, Walker DA (2006) Potential importance of leucine in treatment of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr 136: 319S-323S. PubMed: 16365106.
  19. 19. Donato J Jr., Pedrosa RG, Cruzat VF, Pires IS, Tirapegui J (2006) Effects of leucine supplementation on the body composition and protein status of rats submitted to food restriction. Nutrition 22: 520-527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2005.12.008. PubMed: 16600817.
  20. 20. Vianna D, Resende GFT, Torres-Leal FL, Pantaleão LC, Donato J Jr et al. (2012) Long-term leucine supplementation reduces fat mass gain without changing body protein status of aging rats. Nutrition 28: 182-189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.04.004. PubMed: 21872432.
  21. 21. Zhang Y, Guo K, LeBlanc RE, Loh D, Schwartz GJ et al. (2007) Increasing dietary leucine intake reduces diet-induced obesity and improves glucose and cholesterol metabolism in mice via multimechanisms. Diabetes 56: 1647-1654. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0123. PubMed: 17360978.
  22. 22. Ropelle ER, Pauli JR, Fernandes MFA, Rocco SA, Marin RM et al. (2008) A Central Role for Neuronal AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in High-Protein Diet-Induced Weight Loss. Diabetes 57: 594-605. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0573. PubMed: 18057094.
  23. 23. Freudenberg A, Petzke KJ, Klaus S (2012) Comparison of high-protein diets and leucine supplementation in the prevention of metabolic syndrome and related disorders in mice. J Nutr Biochem 23: 1524-1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.10.005. PubMed: 22405695.
  24. 24. Macotela Y, Emanuelli B, Bång AM, Espinoza DO, Boucher J et al. (2011) Dietary Leucine - An Environmental Modifier of Insulin Resistance Acting on Multiple Levels of Metabolism. PLOS ONE 6: e21187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021187. PubMed: 21731668.
  25. 25. Binder E, Bermudez-Silva FJ, Andre C, Elie M, Romero-Zerbo SY et al. (2013) Leucine Supplementation Protects from Insulin Resistance by Regulating Adiposity Levels. PLOS ONE 8: e74705. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074705. PubMed: 24086364.
  26. 26. Nairizi A, She P, Vary TC, Lynch CJ (2009) Leucine Supplementation of Drinking Water Does Not Alter Susceptibility to Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice. J Nutr 139: 715-719. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.108.100081. PubMed: 19244380.
  27. 27. Torres-Leal FL, Fonseca-Alaniz MH, Teodoro GF, de Capitani MD, Vianna D et al. (2011) Leucine supplementation improves adiponectin and total cholesterol concentrations despite the lack of changes in adiposity or glucose homeostasis in rats previously exposed to a high-fat diet. Nutr Metab (Lond) 8: 62. PubMed: 21899736.
  28. 28. Zemel MB, Bruckbauer A (2012) Effects of a Leucine and Pyridoxine-Containing Nutraceutical on Fat Oxidation, and Oxidative and Inflammatory Stress in Overweight and Obese Subjects. Nutrients 4: 529-541. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4060529. PubMed: 22822451.
  29. 29. Verhoeven S, Vanschoonbeek K, Verdijk LB, Koopman R, Wodzig WK et al. (2009) Long-term leucine supplementation does not increase muscle mass or strength in healthy elderly men. Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1468-1475. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.26668. PubMed: 19321567.
  30. 30. Cota D, Proulx K, Smith KA, Kozma SC, Thomas G et al. (2006) Hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Science 312: 927-930. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124147. PubMed: 16690869.
  31. 31. Donato J Jr., Pedrosa RG, de Araújo JA Jr., Pires IS, Tirapegui J (2007) Effects of leucine and phenylalanine supplementation during intermittent periods of food restriction and refeeding in adult rats. Life Sci 81: 31-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2007.04.015. PubMed: 17512018.
  32. 32. Pedrosa RG, Donato J Jr., Pires ISO, Tirapegui J (2010) Leucine supplementation favors liver protein status but does not reduce body fat in rats during 1 week of food restriction. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 35: 180-183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/H09-132. PubMed: 20383228.
  33. 33. Teodoro GFR, Vianna D, Torres-Leal FL, Pantaleão LC, Matos-Neto EM et al. (2012) Leucine Is Essential for Attenuating Fetal Growth Restriction Caused by a Protein-Restricted Diet in Rats. J Nutr 142: 924-930. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.146266. PubMed: 22457392.
  34. 34. Zeanandin G, Balage M, Schneider SM, Dupont J, Hébuterne X et al. (2012) Differential effect of long-term leucine supplementation on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in old rats: an insulin signaling pathway approach. Age 34: 371-387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-011-9246-0. PubMed: 21472380.
  35. 35. Chen H, Simar D, Ting JHY, Erkelens JRS, Morris MJ (2012) Leucine Improves Glucose and Lipid Status in Offspring from Obese Dams, Dependent on Diet Type, but not Caloric Intake. J Neuroendocrinol 24: 1356-1364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02339.x. PubMed: 22612562.
  36. 36. López N, Sánchez J, Picó C, Palou A, Serra F (2010) Dietary l-leucine supplementation of lactating rats results in a tendency to increase lean/fat ratio associated to lower orexigenic neuropeptide expression in hypothalamus. Peptides 31: 1361-1367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.03.028. PubMed: 20347902.
  37. 37. Li X, Wang X, Liu R, Ma Y, Guo H et al. (2013) Chronic leucine supplementation increases body weight and insulin sensitivity in rats on high-fat diet likely by promoting insulin signaling in insulin-target tissues. Mol Nutr Food Res 57: 1067-1079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200311. PubMed: 23404947.
  38. 38. Koch C, Göddeke S, Krüger M, Tups A (2012) Effect of central and peripheral leucine on energy metabolism in the Djungarian hamster (Phodopus sungorus ). Journal of Comparative Physiology B, Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology: 1-8.
  39. 39. Blouet C, Jo Y-H, Li X, Schwartz GJ (2009) Mediobasal Hypothalamic Leucine Sensing Regulates Food Intake through Activation of a Hypothalamus–Brainstem Circuit. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 8302-8311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1668-09.2009. PubMed: 19571121.
  40. 40. Reiter AK, Anthony TG, Anthony JC, Jefferson LS, Kimball SR (2004) The mTOR signaling pathway mediates control of ribosomal protein mRNA translation in rat liver. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36: 2169-2179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2004.04.004. PubMed: 15313464.
  41. 41. Lynch CJ, Patson BJ, Anthony J, Vaval A, Jefferson LS et al. (2002) Leucine is a direct-acting nutrient signal that regulates protein synthesis in adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E503-E513. PubMed: 12169444.
  42. 42. Hoffman GE, Lyo D (2002) Anatomical markers of activity in neuroendocrine systems: are we all 'fos-ed out'? J Neuroendocrinol 14: 259-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2826.2002.00775.x. PubMed: 11963822.
  43. 43. Sweatt AJ, Wood M, Suryawan A, Wallin R, Willingham MC et al. (2004) Branched-chain amino acid catabolism: unique segregation of pathway enzymes in organ systems and peripheral nerves. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286: E64-E76. PubMed: 12965870.
  44. 44. Blouet C, Schwartz Gary J (2012) Brainstem Nutrient Sensing in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Inhibits Feeding. Cell Metab 16: 579-587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.003. PubMed: 23123165.
  45. 45. Rieu I, Sornet C, Bayle G, Prugnaud J, Pouyet C et al. (2003) Leucine-supplemented meal feeding for ten days beneficially affects postprandial muscle protein synthesis in old rats. J Nutr 133: 1198-1205. PubMed: 12672943.
  46. 46. Magne H, Savary-Auzeloux I, Migné C, Peyron M-A, Combaret L et al. (2012) Contrarily to whey and high protein diets, dietary free leucine supplementation cannot reverse the lack of recovery of muscle mass after prolonged immobilization during ageing. J Physiol 590: 2035-2049. PubMed: 22351629.
  47. 47. Sugawara T, Yoshiwaki I, Nishizawa N, Nagasawa T (2007) Supplemantation with dietary leucine to a protein-deficient diet supresses myofibrillar protein degradation in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 53: 552-555. doi:https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.53.552. PubMed: 18202546.
  48. 48. Freudenberg A, Petzke KJ, Klaus S (2013) Dietary L: -leucine and L: -alanine supplementation have similar acute effects in the prevention of high-fat diet-induced obesity. Amino Acids 44: 519-528. PubMed: 22847780.
  49. 49. Li H, Xu M, Lee J, He C, Xie Z (2012) Leucine Supplementation Increases SIRT1 Expression and Prevents Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Metabolic Disorders in High Fat Diet-induced Obese Mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 303: E1234-E1244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00198.2012. PubMed: 22967499.
  50. 50. Guo K, Yu YH, Hou J, Zhang Y (2010) Chronic leucine supplementation improves glycemic control in etiologically distinct mouse models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab (Lond) 7: 57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-57. PubMed: 20624298.
  51. 51. Drgonova J, Jacobsson JA, Han JC, Yanovski JA, Fredriksson R et al. (2013) Involvement of the Neutral Amino Acid Transporter SLC6A15 and Leucine in Obesity-Related Phenotypes. PLOS ONE 8: e68245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068245. PubMed: 24023709.
  52. 52. Imamura W, Yoshimura R, Takai M, Yamamura J, Kanamoto R et al. (2013) Adverse effects of excessive leucine intake depend on dietary protein intake: a transcriptomic analysis to identify useful biomarkers. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 59: 45-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.59.45. PubMed: 23535539.
  53. 53. Karnani Mahesh M, Apergis-Schoute J, Adamantidis A, Jensen Lise T, de Lecea L et al. (2011) Activation of Central Orexin/Hypocretin Neurons by Dietary Amino Acids. Neuron 72: 616-629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.027. PubMed: 22099463.
  54. 54. Bernstein IL, Chavez M, Allen D, Taylor EM (1992) Area postrema mediation of physiological and behavioral effects of lithium chloride in the rat. Brain Res 575: 132-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(92)90432-9. PubMed: 1324085.
  55. 55. Ritter S, McGlone JJ, Kelley KW (1980) Absence of lithium-induced taste aversion after area postrema lesion. Brain Res 201: 501-506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(80)91061-6. PubMed: 7417860.
  56. 56. Coil JD, Norgren R (1981) Taste aversions conditioned with intravenous copper sulfate: Attenuation by ablation of the area postrema. Brain Res 212: 425-433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(81)90474-1. PubMed: 7225877.
  57. 57. Paxton R, Harris RA (1984) Regulation of branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase. Arch Biochem Biophys 231: 48-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(84)90361-8. PubMed: 6721501.
  58. 58. Harris RA, Joshi M, Jeoung NH (2004) Mechanisms responsible for regulation of branched-chain amino acid catabolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313: 391-396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.007. PubMed: 14684174.
  59. 59. She P, Van Horn C, Reid T, Hutson SM, Cooney RN et al. (2007) Obesity-related elevations in plasma leucine are associated with alterations in enzymes involved in branched-chain amino acid metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 293: E1552-E1563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00134.2007. PubMed: 17925455.
  60. 60. Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD et al. (2009) A Branched-Chain Amino Acid-Related Metabolic Signature that Differentiates Obese and Lean Humans and Contributes to Insulin Resistance. Cell Metab 9: 311-326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002. PubMed: 19356713.
  61. 61. García-Espinosa MA, Wallin R, Hutson SM, Sweatt AJ (2007) Widespread neuronal expression of branched-chain aminotransferase in the CNS: implications for leucine/glutamate metabolism and for signaling by amino acids. J Neurochem 100: 1458-1468. PubMed: 17348860.
  62. 62. She P, Reid TM, Bronson SK, Vary TC, Hajnal A et al. (2007) Disruption of BCATm in mice leads to increased energy expenditure associated with the activation of a futile protein turnover cycle. Cell Metab 6: 181-194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.003. PubMed: 17767905.
  63. 63. Donato J Jr., Cavalcante JC, Silva RJ, Teixeira AS, Bittencourt JC et al. (2010) Male and female odors induce Fos expression in chemically defined neuronal population. Physiol Behav 99: 67-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.10.012. PubMed: 19857504.
  64. 64. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2001) The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press.
    • 65. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25: 402-408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262. PubMed: 11846609.