Reader Comments (87)
Post a new comment on this article
-
0 Responses07 Mar 2016
17:08 GMT
Most RecentPLOS ONE notice: Update on follow up Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 07 Mar 2016 at 17:08 GMT -
12 Responses22 Dec 2015
14:45 GMT
Most RecentAuthors refuse to share data when requested Posted by JamesCoyne on 11 Dec 2015 at 17:55 GMT -
0 Responses15 Dec 2015
11:19 GMT
Most RecentNotification from PLOS staff Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 15 Dec 2015 at 11:19 GMT -
0 Responses13 Dec 2015
23:37 GMT
Most RecentIs this continual refusal to share data prima facie evidence of problems with the study? Posted by esthersiebert on 13 Dec 2015 at 23:37 GMT -
0 Responses13 Dec 2015
13:26 GMT
Most Recent3 Years on from this paper - Prof McCrone and the PACE team should not stand in the way of science Posted by Kgeraghty on 13 Dec 2015 at 13:26 GMT -
0 Responses13 Dec 2015
08:31 GMT
Most Recentsevere concerns about scientific misbehaviour PACE study Posted by LouCorsius on 13 Dec 2015 at 08:31 GMT -
3 Responses13 Dec 2014
20:45 GMT
Most RecentThe statistical plan also mentioned analysing the data based on zero cost for informal care. This is not mentioned. Posted by tkindlon on 23 Dec 2013 at 20:11 GMT -
0 Responses25 Feb 2014
09:20 GMT
Most RecentSensitivity analyses Posted by spjupmc on 25 Feb 2014 at 09:20 GMT -
3 Responses25 Feb 2014
07:09 GMT
Most RecentCBT costs £176/session at Maudsley Hospital (one of trial centres). This translates to CBT not being cost effective when a QALY is valued at £30,000 in healthcare costs Posted by tkindlon on 23 Feb 2014 at 02:37 GMT -
0 Responses24 Feb 2014
20:47 GMT
Most Recent -
1 Response21 Feb 2014
17:41 GMT
Most RecentAdditional analyses from statistical analysis plan and trial's protocol should also be released. Posted by EdJackson on 21 Feb 2014 at 17:38 GMT -
3 Responses18 Feb 2014
17:33 GMT
Most RecentWhy were welfare benefits and insurance payouts excluded from the cost-analyses? Posted by biophile on 18 Feb 2014 at 03:28 GMT -
0 Responses14 May 2013
20:30 GMT
Most RecentThe results of the PACE Trial do not live up to the hype surrounding the PACE Trial Posted by ZigZag on 14 May 2013 at 20:30 GMT -
3 Responses01 Feb 2013
23:04 GMT
Most RecentIf CBT works and is Cost-Effective Why Does the Data Not Show This? Posted by Kgeraghty on 30 Jan 2013 at 14:55 GMT -
5 Responses14 Sep 2012
16:23 GMT
Most RecentResponses to some of the points raised Posted by spjupmc on 20 Aug 2012 at 21:51 GMT -
8 Responses24 Aug 2012
12:45 GMT
Most RecentMedia Coverage of This Article Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 06 Aug 2012 at 20:14 GMT -
1 Response20 Aug 2012
21:29 GMT
Most RecentCan the authors show the Sensitivity Analysis results for Societal Benefits for CBT & GET? Posted by SMcGrath on 20 Aug 2012 at 15:26 GMT -
0 Responses09 Aug 2012
22:18 GMT
Most RecentFar removed from the disease process Posted by Fiorella on 09 Aug 2012 at 22:18 GMT -
1 Response09 Aug 2012
11:06 GMT
Most RecentToo many questions still unanswered by this trial..... Posted by JoanCrawford on 07 Aug 2012 at 13:25 GMT -
1 Response08 Aug 2012
10:43 GMT
Most RecentPACE results undermine the cognitive behavioural model of chronic fatigue syndrome. Posted by biophile on 08 Aug 2012 at 05:06 GMT -
0 Responses08 Aug 2012
04:20 GMT
Most RecentCBT and GET did not significantly reduce employment losses, overall service costs, welfare benefits or other financial payments Posted by biophile on 08 Aug 2012 at 04:20 GMT -
5 Responses08 Aug 2012
00:31 GMT
Most RecentCoercive practices by insurance companies and others should stop following the publication of these results Posted by tkindlon on 06 Aug 2012 at 02:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 Aug 2012
16:23 GMT
Most RecentWhat does this have to do with ME? Posted by BarrySavage on 07 Aug 2012 at 16:23 GMT -
0 Responses05 Aug 2012
23:29 GMT
Most RecentThe differences between statistical practical and clinical significance as applied to the White et al. study Posted by MEAdvocacy on 05 Aug 2012 at 23:29 GMT -
1 Response05 Aug 2012
11:56 GMT
Most RecentComment on Press Release Posted by tkindlon on 03 Aug 2012 at 19:56 GMT -
0 Responses05 Aug 2012
01:29 GMT
Most RecentAll the cost-effectiveness calculations involve self-report measures (EQ-5D, CFQ, SF-36 PF) Posted by tkindlon on 05 Aug 2012 at 01:29 GMT -
1 Response04 Aug 2012
13:01 GMT
Most RecentTargeting the therapies to "overall improvers" could significantly improve cost-effectiveness Posted by AndrewK on 04 Aug 2012 at 08:17 GMT -
0 Responses03 Aug 2012
16:45 GMT
Most RecentPossible (small) error in data for (post hoc) criteria for improvement Posted by tkindlon on 03 Aug 2012 at 16:45 GMT -
1 Response03 Aug 2012
16:36 GMT
Most RecentData for predefined primary outcome measure "overall improvers" has thus far not been published Posted by tkindlon on 03 Aug 2012 at 16:00 GMT -
1 Response03 Aug 2012
00:31 GMT
Most RecentIs a therapy truly effective if it does not have an effect? Posted by JohnM on 02 Aug 2012 at 20:08 GMT -
1 Response03 Aug 2012
00:20 GMT
Most RecentPACE Trial Results Posted by PeterKemp on 02 Aug 2012 at 13:45 GMT -
1 Response03 Aug 2012
00:14 GMT
Most RecentAre treatments that only works for 1/3 of patients truly cost effective Posted by kelly1 on 02 Aug 2012 at 00:12 GMT -
1 Response02 Aug 2012
12:36 GMT
Most Recent'Cost-effectiveness' is irrelevant when safety has not even been addressed in the PACE trial Posted by AngelaKennedy on 02 Aug 2012 at 11:35 GMT -
0 Responses01 Aug 2012
21:41 GMT
Most RecentFalse results from a flawed trial Posted by IiME on 01 Aug 2012 at 21:41 GMT