Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Prostate Cancer Cell Lines under Hypoxia Exhibit Greater Stem-Like Properties

  • Yuanyuan Ma,

    Affiliations Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Dongming Liang,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Jian Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Karol Axcrona,

    Affiliation Department of Urology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Gunnar Kvalheim,

    Affiliation Department of Cell Therapy, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Trond Stokke,

    Affiliation Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Jahn M. Nesland,

    Affiliations Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯
  • Zhenhe Suo

    zhenhes@medisin.uio.no

    Affiliations Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    ⨯

Retraction

Following the publication of this article [1], concerns have been raised regarding the RT-PCR data presented in Fig 2A and the immunochemistry data presented in Fig 2B:

  • Fig 2A RT-PCR, the bands in the Nanog panel 1% O2 treated PC-3 cells (lanes 1–4) appear similar to the bands in the Nanog panel 7% O2 treated DU145 cells (lanes 5–8).
  • Fig 2A RT-PCR, the bands in the Nanog panel 20% O2 treated PC-3 cells (lanes 1–4) appear similar to the bands in the Nanog panel 20% O2 treated DU145 cells (lanes 5–8).
  • Fig 2A RT-PCR, the bands in the GAPDH panel 1% O2 treated PC-3 cells (lanes 1–4) appear similar to the bands in the GAPDH panel 20% O2 treated DU145 cells (lanes 5–8).
  • Fig 2B, the immunocytochemistry image of Nanog panel 20% O2 treated PC-3 cells appears similar to the immunocytochemistry image of Nanog panel 20% O2 treated DU145 cells.

The Commission on Research Integrity at Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo completed an investigation and concluded that there was evidence of scientific misconduct in the case of Fig 2A, and negligence in the preparation of Fig 2B.

In light of the above concerns and in line with the institution’s recommendation, the PLOS ONE Editors retract this article.

YM, DL, JL, GK, and JMN did not respond. KA and TS agreed with the retraction. ZS did not agree with the retraction.

8 May 2020: The PLOS ONE Editors (2020) Retraction: Prostate Cancer Cell Lines under Hypoxia Exhibit Greater Stem-Like Properties. PLOS ONE 15(5): e0233203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233203 View retraction

Abstract

Hypoxia is an important environmental change in many cancers. Hypoxic niches can be occupied by cancer stem/progenitor-like cells that are associated with tumor progression and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, it has not yet been fully elucidated how hypoxia influences the stem-like properties of prostate cancer cells. In this report, we investigated the effects of hypoxia on human prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3 and DU145. In comparison to normoxia (20% O2), 7% O2 induced higher expressions of HIF-1α and HIF-2α, which were associated with upregulation of Oct3/4 and Nanog; 1% O2 induced even greater levels of these factors. The upregulated NANOG mRNA expression in hypoxia was confirmed to be predominantly retrogene NANOGP8. Similar growth rates were observed for cells cultivated under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 48 hours; however, the colony formation assay revealed that 48 hours of hypoxic pretreatment resulted in the formation of more colonies. Treatment with 1% O2 also extended the G0/G1 stage, resulting in more side population cells, and induced CD44 and ABCG2 expressions. Hypoxia also increased the number of cells positive for ABCG2 expression, which were predominantly found to be CD44bright cells. Correspondingly, the sorted CD44bright cells expressed higher levels of ABCG2, Oct3/4, and Nanog than CD44dim cells, and hypoxic pretreatment significantly increased the expressions of these factors. CD44bright cells under normoxia formed significantly more colonies and spheres compared with the CD44dim cells, and hypoxic pretreatment even increased this effect. Our data indicate that prostate cancer cells under hypoxia possess greater stem-like properties.

Citation: Ma Y, Liang D, Liu J, Axcrona K, Kvalheim G, Stokke T, et al. (2011) Prostate Cancer Cell Lines under Hypoxia Exhibit Greater Stem-Like Properties. PLoS ONE 6(12): e29170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170

Editor: Dean G. Tang, The University of Texas M.D Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America

Received: August 1, 2011; Accepted: November 22, 2011; Published: December 28, 2011

Copyright: © 2011 Ma et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by The Norwegian Radium Hospital Research Foundation with grant number 333005 to ZS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Somatic tumors, including prostate cancer, contain a small subset of stem-like cells, called cancer stem cells, with capacities for self-renewal, differentiation, and initiation of new tumors. It has been demonstrated that cancer stem cells can escape from radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and are able to form metastatic tumors in other organs [1], [2]. Cancer stem cells preferentially reside in specific hypoxic microenvironment-niches, often existing inside tumors [3], [4].

The hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) are key regulators found in mammalian cells under lower oxygen tension; they are involved with multiple functions, such as cell survival, angiogenesis, and stem cell maintenance, and play essential roles in cellular and systemic homeostasis in response to hypoxia [5]. HIFs are heterodimers; HIF1A (HIF-1α) and EPAS1 (HIF-2α) are the two major isoforms of the α-subunit, and share a high degree of sequence homology. Oct3/4 (also called POU5F1) and Nanog are embryonic stem cell markers that are important for transcription and in maintaining self-renewal of embryonic stem cells and primordial germ cells. They have also been identified in different somatic tumors, including head and neck, lung, colorectal, ovarian, and prostate cancers [6]–[11]. Comparatively, the expressions of these genes are down-regulated in all differentiated somatic cell types, in vitro as well as in vivo [12], [13]. NANOG, also called NANOG1, has several pseudogenes, and among them NANOGP8 has later been confirmed to be a retrogene. Both NANOG1 and NANOGP8 expressions have been identified in different cancer cell types [14], [15], including prostate cancer cells [16].

A number of surface markers have been used to isolate putative cancer stem/progenitor cells. In prostate cancer, the early progenitor cells are associated with several specific surface markers, such as CD44, CD133, and CXCR4 [17]–[19]. Side population technology has also been used to isolate cancer stem cells with the ability to pump out Hoechst 33342 [20]. Efflux of the dye is attributed to members of the ATP-binding cassette family, such as ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP). The upregulation of ABCG2 is also responsible for chemotherapeutic resistance in certain cancer cells [21]. In breast and prostate cancers, previous studies have identified CD44+ or CD117+/ABCG2+ cells with stem-like characteristics, such as increased clonogenic/tumorigenic properties, higher expressions of stemness genes, and stronger ability to form tumors in animal models [19], [22], [23].

Hypoxia helps embryonic stem cells to maintain stemness and higher oxygen tensions drive cells into proliferation and differentiation, which are more susceptible to conventional treatment modalities [24], [25]. Similar results have been observed in adult cells, like adipocytes, fibroblasts, and several types of cancer cells [26]–[28]. However, the effects of hypoxia on prostate cancer cells have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, in this study we examined the prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU145 at different oxygen tensions in order to better understand the effect of hypoxia on the stem-like properties of the cells. Stemness factors, Oct3/4 and Nanog, were expressed at higher levels in the cells under hypoxic cultivation and these cells exhibited elevated colony formation potential compared to the cells under normoxic condition. Furthermore, the upregulated NANOG mRNA expression under hypoxia was confirmed mainly derived from the retrogene NANOGP8. In these prostate cancer cell lines, hypoxia also increased the fraction of side population cells, extended the G0/G1 stage and resulted in higher levels ABCG2 and CD44 expressions. Additional experiments demonstrated that CD44bright cells exhibited significantly greater stemness, as verified by colony formation assay, sphere growth assay, and stemness factor expression analyses.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Human prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3 and DU145, were purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, USA) and maintained in our lab for this study. For conventional cell culture, cells were seeded in culture flasks with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator in an atmosphere of 20% O2, 5% CO2, and 75% N2.

The Xvivo Closed Incubation System (Xvivo system 300 C, BioSpherix, New York, USA) was used in this study in order to accurately maintain different oxygen tensions in different chambers. After 24 hours of cultivation in conventional cell culture (allowing cells to attach onto the flasks), the cells were transferred into different chambers with 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2; 7% O2, 5% CO2, and 88% N2; or 20% O2, 5% CO2 and 75% N2 for variable periods of time before being harvested for additional analysis.

Semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the cultivated cells using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. To eliminate any DNA, DNase I was used in the RNA isolation procedure. RNA sample concentrations were quantified using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop ND-1000, USA) at OD260/280.

Complementary DNA (cDNA) was subsequently synthesized from 5 µg total RNA using the Multiscribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The conditions for reverse transcription were: 25°C for 10 minutes, 37°C for 12 minutes, 85°C for 5 minutes, followed by holding at 4°C. cDNA was stored at −70°C for later PCR analyses.

PCR amplification of cDNA was performed using a PCR system (DOPPIO VWR, UK) and the following program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes; followed by 30 cycles (28 cycles for GAPDH) of annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds; followed by termination with a 10 minute elongation step at 72°C. The primers used for RT-PCR were: for Nanog, F 5′-ATGCCTCACACGGAGACTGT-3′ and R 5′-AGGGCTGTCCTGAATAAGCA-3′, amplifying a 66-bp fragment; for Oct3/4, F 5′-ACATGTGTAAGCTGCGGCC-3′ and R 5′-GTTGTGCATAGTCGCTGCTTG-3′, amplifying a 297-bp fragment; for HIF-1α, F 5′-AGTGTACCCTAACTAGCCGAGGAA-3′ and R 5′-CTGAGGTTGGTTACTGTTGGTATCA-3′, amplifying a 113-bp fragment; for HIF-2α, F 5′-GACCAGCAGATGGACAACTTGTAC-3′ and R 5′-CAGAAAGATCATGTCGCCATCTT-3′, amplifying a 84-bp fragment; and for GAPDH, F 5′-CCTCAAGATCATCAGCAATGC-3′ and R 5′-TGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCACG-3′, amplifying a 101-bp product. The experiments were repeated at least three times.

The amplified PCR products were separated by 7.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, stained with GelRed (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen), and visualized with a syngene image system (G: BOX Syngene, USA).

The mRNA expressions of NANOG1 and NANOGP8 were measured by quantitative PCR using a Taqman ABI 7900 Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems). The published specific primers and probes [29] were used in this study . For NANOG1: forward primer was 5′-CGCCCTGCCTAGAAAAGACATTT -3′, reverse primer was 5′-AGAAGCCGTCTCTGGCTATAGATAA -3′, and the probe was CTGCTAAGGACAACATTGAT; for NANOGP8: forward primer was 5′-CGCCCTGCCTAGAAAAGACATTT-3′ , reverse primer was 5′-ACGAGTTTGGATATCTTTAGGGTTTAGAATC-3′, and the probe was CCTTGGCTGCCGTCTCTG. All the primers and probes labeled with FAM-MGB were obtained from Applied Biosystems. The GAPDH was used as an internal control and the Ct values at 20% O2 were used as calibrators for evaluating NANOG1 and NANOGP8 expression levels in response to hypoxia. The experiments were performed in duplicate. The expression levels of the NANOG1 and NANOGP8 were analyzed through the ΔΔCt method [29].

Immunoblotting

Cells were quickly rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and scraped into RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS; Thermo Scientific Pierce, Germany), with protease inhibitors (0.1 µM aprotinin, 1.0 mM PMSF, 1 µM leupeptin, 1 µM pepstatin) added immediately before use. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C and the supernatants were transferred to new tubes. The protein concentrations were measured with a Bio-Rad protein assay according to the manufacturer's instruction. The samples were heated with a benchtop heater (Model 111002, Boekel Scientific, USA) at 100°C for 5 minutes in SDS-loading buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8; 10% Glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.6 M DTT, 0.05% bromophenol blue), and then an equal amount of protein (50 µg) per sample was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membrane (BIO-RAD, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-Tween for 60 minutes at room temperature and then incubated with the primary antibodies at optimal dilution in TBST/5% milk overnight at 4°C. The optimized antibodies used in this study included: HIF-1α (1 µg/ml MAB1536, R&D), HIF-2α (1 µg/ml MAB2886, R&D), GAPDH (0.2 µg/ml AF5718, R&D), Oct3/4 (1 µg/ml MAB1759, R&D), Nanog (1 µg/ml AF1997, R&D), and ABCG2 (0.5 µg/ml B7059, Sigma-Aldrich). The membranes were then incubated with secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies and immunocomplexes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, UK). Western blotting experiments were repeated at least three times.

Cell block preparation

Cells were grown to 80% confluence and then were digested with 0.25% trypsin and EDTA (Invitrogen, USA), harvested, and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes. Supernatants were discarded, 3 drops of plasma and 2 drops of thrombin were added to the sedimentation, and the contents were carefully mixed by tube rotation. One minute later, the mixture was coagulated and 4% buffered formalin was added to the tube for fixation. The coagulated mass was then placed in linen paper and used to construct a paraffin block by the conventional process.

Immunocytochemistry

Cell blocks were sliced into 4-µm paraffin sections that were then deparaffinized using PT-Link apparatus. Next, the sections were rinsed with DAKO wash buffer, incubated with hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes, and then incubated with primary antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature. The antibodies used and their concentrations were: HIF-1α (mouse, 1∶200; catalog number: NB100-150, Novus), HIF-2α (rabbit, 1∶100; catalog number: NB100-122, Novus), Oct3/4, (goat, 10 µg/ml; catalog number: AF1759, R&D) and Nanog (goat, 5 µg/ml; catalog number: AF1997, R&D).

After another rinse with DAKO wash buffer, mouse/rabbit EnVision FLEX+Linker reagent was added and samples were incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature, followed by incubation with EnVision FLEX+HRP for 30 minutes at room temperature. Samples with primary antibodies from goat were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with mouse anti-goat IgG before the addition of mouse EnVision FLEX+Linker reagent and EnVision FLEX+HRP as described above. The sections were rinsed, color reaction developed with DAB reagent, counterstained in hematoxylin for 20 seconds, dehydrated, and mounted under glass cover slips in preparation for evaluation by microscopy.

Cell counting (cell proliferation rate)

Cell proliferation was evaluated by counting cell numbers using the Electronics Countess Automated Cell Counter (Invitrogen, USA). After trypsinization, the floating cells were collected to create a cell suspension that contained no obvious cell clusters. In each preparation, 10 µl of cell suspension was mixed with 0.4% trypan blue dye (1∶1) before being loaded onto a cell counting chamber slide for cell counting. The number of viable cells that were able to exclude the dye was counted for each experimental condition. For each sample, the cell number was counted at least three times.

Colony formation assay

Using six-well plates, 500 cells per well were maintained in oxygen tensions of 1%, 7%, and 20% for 48 hours. All plates were then placed in an incubator with 20% O2 for 2 weeks for observation of colony formation. Colonies were fixed with 4% buffered formalin for 15 minutes, and then stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 minutes. The plates were gently washed with PBS and dried before microscopic colony evaluation. Colonies that contained more than 30 cells were counted. Colony formation efficiency was calculated as follows: colony formation efficiency = colonies/input cells×100%. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Cell cycle analysis

After incubation under different oxygen tensions, including 1% or 20% O2, the PC-3 and DU145 cells were harvested and fixed with methanol at −20°C overnight. These cells were used to prepare a single cell suspension to which was added 1.5 µg/ml of Hoechst 33258 before the cells were kept on ice for 30 minutes. After that, the samples were analyzed with an LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).

Side population assay

Cells grown to 80% confluence (about 1×106 cells) were harvested and suspended in prewarmed RPMI 1640 medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM HEPES buffer. Hoechst 33342 dye (stock solution of 1 mg/ml; Sigma) was then added to a final concentration of 5 µg/ml, and the mixture was incubated with intermittent shaking for 90 minutes at 37°C, in the presence or absence of verapamil (50 µM; Sigma). Then, the cells were washed with ice-cold HBSS with 2% FBS, centrifuged at 4°C, and resuspended in ice-cold HBSS containing 2% FBS. Propidium iodide was added to the suspended cells to a final concentration of 2 µg/ml, in order to reveal viable cells. Before analysis, the cells were filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer to obtain a single cell suspension. The cell aggregates were discarded from the analysis by doublet discrimination and single cells were analyzed on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Hoechst 33342 dye was excited at 350 nm and the side-population cells were visualized by the use of red (red, 660/10 nm) vs. blue (blue, 424/44 nm) detection.

ABCG2/CD44 phenotype and Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

After 48 hours of incubation at oxygen tensions of 1% and 20%, the PC-3 and DU145 cells were trypsinized, counted, washed with cold FACS buffer (PBS+BSA 0.03%), and resuspended to a final concentration of 106 cells/ml. The cells were pre-blocked with 5% BSA for 30 minutes on ice before they were stained with primary antibodies (anti-CD44 monoclonal antibody directly conjugated with APC (allophycoyanin) and anti-ABCG2 monoclonal antibody directly conjugated with FE (phycoerythin); BD Pharmingen Company) on ice, in the dark, for 30 minutes. Cell suspensions were washed twice, resuspended in 400 µl FACS buffer, and filtered through a 70-µm nylon mesh. Samples were analyzed on a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) for detection of ABCG2 and CD44, and a FACS DiVa cell sorter was used for cell sorting. After cultivation at 1% or 20% O2 for 48 hours, the PC-3 and DU145 cells were sorted based on CD44 expression. For the CD44 positive cells, only the top 10% expressing cells were selected (called CD44bright); for the CD44 negative cells, the bottom 10% expressing cells were isolated (called CD44dim). For each sample, viable and single cells were gated; APC Mouse IgG2b (BD Pharmingen, USA) and FE Mouse IgG2b (BD Pharmingen, USA) isotype controls were used as negative controls.

Sphere formation assay

The assay used was based on previously described methods [30]. After the CD44bright cells were sorted with the method as described above, single CD44bright and CD44dim cells were plated at a density of 300 cells per well, in ultralow attachment six-well plates (Ultra low cluster plates, Life sciences). These cells were cultivated in serum free DMEM/F12 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20 ng/ml EGF and 20 ng/ml bFGF for ten days under normoxia conditions before the spheres were evaluated under inverse miscopy and counted (more than 30 cells within a sphere was considered to be a full sphere). Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Statistical analyses

For each experiment, data are shown as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments; SPSS software (version 16.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using the one-way ANOVA test and Student's t-test (P<0.05 was considered statistical significance).

Results

Hypoxia induces expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α, Oct3/4 and Nanog

HIF-1α and HIF-2α, the major transcriptional factors responding to hypoxia, were examined in human prostate cancer cells PC-3 and DU145 that were exposed to different oxygen tensions for variable periods of time. At 20% O2 tension, HIF-1α and HIF-2α were weakly expressed at both the mRNA and protein levels; comparatively higher levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression were observed at 7% O2 tension, and the highest levels were seen at 1% O2 tension (Figure 1A). At reduced oxygen tension levels, these two factors were already upregulated after 6 hours of cultivation. Their expressions reached the highest levels at 12 hours of cultivation at 7% O2 tension, but reached highest levels at only 6 hours of cultivation at 1% O2. Protein expression after 48 hours of cultivation at different oxygen tensions was also studied by immunocytochemistry (Figure 1B). The expressions of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were consistently higher in the hypoxia-treated cells, in agreement with the findings obtained by RT-PCR and immunoblotting.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Hypoxia increases the expressions of HIF-1α and HIF-2α.

(A) In comparison to the cells cultivated at 20% O2, the cells cultivated at 7% O2 show higher levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α, and the cells cultivated at 1% O2 show the highest levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α by both RT-PCR and immunoblotting. (B) Immunocytochemistry reveals higher levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions in the cells cultivated under 7% O2 and the highest levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α expressions in the cells cultivated under 1% O2 for both cell lines. The breast carcinoma sections were used as positive controls for both HIF-1α and HIF-2α. All photos were originally taken at 200× and all the insets were taken at 400×.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g001

Oct3/4 and Nanog are frequently used as markers for the undifferentiated cells and play an essential role in sustaining capacity of self-renewal in adult stem cells [31], [32]. The expressions of these transcription factors were also examined in PC-3 and DU145 cells that were cultivated at different oxygen tensions. At both the mRNA and protein levels (Figure 2A), weak expressions of Oct3/4 and Nanog were revealed in these two cell lines cultivated at 20% O2 tension, while their expressions were upregulated in cells cultivated under 7% and 1% O2 conditions. In both cell lines, the expressions of these two factors were higher at 1% O2 than at 7% O2. As was also seen in immunoblotting analyses (Figure 2A), Oct3/4 and Nanog began to substantially increase as early as 6 hours after the cells were transferred to 1% O2, and reached maximum levels at 12 hours for both cell lines. When the cells were placed in 7% O2, the expressions of these two factors were also substantially elevated after 6 hours, and reached the highest levels at 12 hours cultivation; however, these expression levels were weaker than those observed in cells exposed to 1% O2. Similar results were also obtained by immunocytochemistry (Figure 2B). Following exposure to hypoxic condition, enhanced Oct3/4 and Nanog expressions were seen in both PC-3 and DU145 cells.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Hypoxia increases the expressions of Oct3/4 and Nanog.

(A) In comparison to the cells cultivated at 20% O2, the cells cultivated at 7% O2 show higher levels of Oct3/4 and Nanog expressions, and the cells cultivated at 1% O2 show the highest levels of Oct3/4 and Nanog expressions in PC-3 and DU145 cell lines by both RT-PCR and immunoblotting. (B) Immunocytochemistry reveals corresponding higher levels of Oct3/4 and Nanog expressions at 7% O2 and the highest levels of Oct3/4 and Nanog expressions at 1% O2, in comparison to the cells cultivated at 20% O2 for both cell lines. Human seminoma tissue sections were used as positive controls for these two antibodies. All photos were originally taken at 200× and all the insets were taken at 400×.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g002

To determine whether the elevated NANOG expression was derived from NANOG1 or NANOGP8, quantitative RT-PCR analyses were further performed, with the corresponding cells cultivated under normoxia as calibrators. It was repeatedly verified that the NANOG1 expression in the cells under normoxia was at very low level, with average Ct values 37.24 and 37.37 for the PC-3 cell and DU145 cells, respectively. However, the NANOGP8 expression in the cells under normoxia was relatively high, with average Ct values 33.56 and 33.51 for the PC-3 cell and DU145 cells, respectively. Although higher levels NANOG1 and NANOGP8 expressions could be observed in both cell lines under hypoxia, the elevated NANOG expression was confirmed predominantly NANOGP8, with up to 6-fold and 10-fold increase in expression in the PC-3 and DU145 cells under 1% O2, respectively (Figure 3). Since the NANOG1 expression in the cells under normoxia was extremely low, the 2.6-fold and 3.1-fold increase in expression of this gene in the PC-3 and DU145 cells under 1% O2 represented still quite low expression level.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Quantitative PCR results of NANOG1 and NONOGP8.

Compared to the cells under normoxia, there are elevated NANOG1 and NONOGP8 expressions in the cells under 7% O2 for both cell lines, with up to 1.8-fold increase NANOG1 expression and up to 2.5-fold NONOGP8 increase in both cell lines; the cells under 1% O2 express even higher levels of NANOG1 and NONOGP8, with 2.6-fold and 3.1-fold increase in NANOG1 expression in the PC-3 and DU145 cell lines, respectively, and with 6-fold and 10-fold increase in NONOGP8 expressions in the PC-3 and DU145 cell lines, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g003

Hypoxia increases colony formation capability and extends G0/G1 stage

Since hypoxia increased the expression of stemness factors, we next investigated whether hypoxia influenced the proliferation of these cells. The PC-3 and DU145 cells were cultivated under normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia conditions (1% O2 and 7% O2) for 48 hours for the proliferation assay. As shown in Figure 4A, for each cell line there were no statistically significant differences in proliferation of the cells cultivated at different oxygen tensions (P>0.05), although the cells grew somewhat slower under hypoxia than normoxia. Next, we asked whether hypoxia-pretreatment could influence clonogenicty in these cells. The cells were initially exposed to different oxygen tensions for 48 hours, followed by transfer to a normoxic chamber (20% O2) for 14 days for the colony formation assay. Compared to the cells that were steadily cultivated at 20% O2, more colonies were observed in the cells that were pretreated at 7% O2, and even more colonies were seen in the cells pretreated at 1% O2 (Figure 4B). Compared to the cells always cultivated under normoxia, statistically significantly higher colony formation efficiency was identified in the hypoxia-pretreated PC-3 and DU145 ells (Figure 4C). Cell cycle analyses demonstrated an extended G0/G1 stage in the cells that were exposed to 1% O2 for 48 hours in comparison with the cells cultivated at 20% O2 as controls (P<0.05) (Figure 4D and E), indicating more cells in a quiescent status under hypoxia.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Hypoxic effects on cell proliferation, colony formation and cell cycle.

(A) Cell proliferation curves show no statistical difference for cell growth under different oxygen tensions (P>0.05). (B) Colony formation assay for both cell lines shows more colonies in the cells pre-treated at 7% O2 for 48 hours and even more colonies in the cells pre-treated under 1% O2 (C) Histograms for the colony formation efficiency shows statistically higher efficiency in the cells pre-treated under hypoxia (7% or 1% O2) for both cell lines (P<0.0001). (D) Flow cytometry shows extended G0/G1 stage for both cell lines which have been cultivated under 1% O2 for 48 hours, in comparison to the cells always kept under normoxia. (E) Statistical analyses reveal significantly extended G0/G1 stage in the cells cultivated under hypoxia for both cell lines (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g004

Hypoxia increases the fraction of cells with stem-like phenotype

Side population cells, assumed to contain putative prostate cancer stem cells, are known to pump out the dye Hoechst 33342 [20], [33]. Cells exhibiting this activity were further assessed during cultivation at different oxygen tensions. Higher fractions of these side population cells were observed in cultures kept at 1% O2 tension for 48 hours in comparison to the cells cultivated at 20% O2 (Figure 5A and B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. Stem-like phenotype analyses by flow cytometry.

PC-3 and DU145 cells were cultivated in 1% O2 and 20% O2 coditions for 48 hours to analyze stem-like phenotype through flow cytometry assay. (A) The representative images show that side population cells were induced in both cell lines after hypoxic treatment. (B) Statistic analyses show significant difference in side population. (C) Flow cytometry analyses show higher levels of ABCG2 expression intensity in both cell lines under hypoxia. (D) Histogram shows statistically significant difference in ABCG2 expression. (E) Flow cytometry analyses show higher CD44 expression intensity in both cell lines under hypoxia. (F) Histogram shows statistically significant difference in CD44 expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g005

ABCG2 and CD44 have been described as prostate cancer stem-like markers based on clinical investigations and studies in prostate cancer cell lines [19], [33]. Therefore, ABCG2 and CD44 expressions in the PC-3 and DU145 cells that were incubated at 1% or 20% O2 tensions for 48 hours were examined with flow cytometry. As shown in Figures 5C and D, threw were 1.20-fold and 1.42-fold increase in ABCG2 expression in the PC-3 and DU145 cells under 1% O2, respectively, in comparison to the cells always cultivated under normoxia. Similarly, there were 1.50-fold and 1.45-fold increases in CD44 expression in the PC-3 and DU145 cells under 1% O2, respectively, in comparison to the cells always cultivated under normoxia (Figures 5E and F).

Since hypoxia could induce both ABCG2 and CD44 expression in both cell lines, we further investigated the relationship between CD44 and ABCG2. Double staining of these two surface markers revealed that the hypoxia-induced ABCG2+ cells were primarily CD44bright cells, and the CD44dim cells under the same culture condition were mostly negative for ABCG2 expression (Figure 6A).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. CD44bright cells are mainly positive for ABCG2, Oct3/4 and Nanog.

(A) Double staining of CD44 and ABCG2 surface markers with flow cytometry assay shows higher levels expressions of these factors in both cell lines under hypoxia for 48 hours. (B) The CD44bright cells under normoxia express higher levels of ABCG2, Oct3/4 and Nanog, but the CD44dim cells under the same normoxia condition express very low levels of these factors. The CD44bright cells pretreated under 1% O2 for 48 hours show even higher levels of these factors compared to the CD44bright cells cultivated under normoxia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g006

CD44bright cells show stem-like properties

The sorted CD44bright and CD44dim cells were further examined by immunoblotting. As shown in Figure 6B, in both PC-3 and DU145 cell lines grown under normoxia, the CD44bright cells expressed higher levels of ABCG2, Oct3/4, and Nanog than the CD44dim cells. Hypoxic pretreatment of these cell lines for 48 hours resulted in even greater levels of expression of these factors in the CD44bright cells.

After verifying the higher stemness factor and ABCG2 expressions in the CD44bright cells, both under hypoxia and normoxia, we examined whether the CD44bright cells had greater colony formation capability (a property of stem-like cells). As can be seen in Figures 7A and 7B, the CD44bright cells formed significantly more colonies compared to the CD44dim cells. Next, we tested how the CD44bright and CD44dim cells responded to hypoxic pretreatment (1% O2), in comparison to the cells consistently cultivated at normoxia. The CD44bright cells which were hypoxic-pretreated for 48 hours could form significantly more colonies than the CD44bright cells without hypoxic pretreatment.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 7. CD44bright cells show stem-like properties.

(A) For both PC-3 and DU145 cell lines, more colonies are shown in the CD44bright cells than the CD44dim cells under nomoxia condition, while even more colonies can be seen in the CD44bright cells pretreated under 1% O2 for 48 hours. (B) Histograms for the colony formation efficiency show statistically significantly higher efficiency in the CD44bright cells than the corresponding CD44dim cells (P<0.0001 for both cell lines), and even higher level efficiency in the hypoxia- pretreated CD44bright cells in comparisons with the CD44bright cells without hypoxic pretreatment (P<0.05 for both cell lines). (C) Sphere formation assay shows spheres in the CD44bright cells in both normoxia and hypoxic pretreated cells while there is no qualified sphere in the corresponding CD44dim cells for both cell lines. (D) Histograms show sphere formation efficiency in the CD44bright and CD44dim cells with and without hypoxia pretreatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029170.g007

The sorted subpopulations of CD44bright and CD44dim cells were additionally examined by sphere growth assays since sphere growth is common in stem-like cells. As shown in Figure 7C, the CD44dim cells hardly formed any sphere, no matter the cells were hypoxia pre-treated or not. However, there was a great number of spheres in the CD44bright cells from both cell lines, either from the nomoxia or from the hypoxia pretreatment. Although there was no significant sphere formation efficiency difference in the hypoxia pre-treated CD44bright cells compared to the nomoxia pre-treated CD44bright cells in both cell lines, the hypoxia pre-treated CD44bright cells in the PC-3 cell line demonstrated a 1.21-fold increase in sphere formation efficiency, and the hypoxia pre-treated CD44bright cells in the DU145 cells revealed a 1.14-fold increase in sphere formation efficiency, in comparison with their control cells.

Discussion

Hypoxia often occurs in the inner part of solid tumors, creating an environment where undifferentiated tumor cells can exist. For prostate cancer, hypoxia is commonly associated with poor prognosis [34]. In this study, we have demonstrated that hypoxia can upregulate stem-like properties of the prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU145. It has been hypothesized that cancer stem-like cells may persist as a distinct population within tumors and cause relapse and metastasis following general cancer therapies like radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, it is of great value to identify factors that affect the stem-like properties of cancer cells and to determine what conditions influence the differentiation of stem cells.

The hypoxia inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α are reportedly activated in aggressive tumor cells [35], [36]. HIF-1α expression is increased in primary prostate cancers, prostate cancer bone marrow metastasis of PC-3 and brain metastasis of DU145, compared to in normal prostate epithelium [37], [38]. In this study, HIF-1α was weakly expressed under normoxia and their expressions were increased under hypoxic conditions. This is in agreement with earlier reports of higher expressions in response to hypoxia [39]–[41]. In our study, HIF-2α was also upregulated in response to hypoxia treatment in consistent with increased expression of HIF-1α. Moreover, in a clinical observation, HIF-1α expression was elevated in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplastic lesions (the precursor of a majority of invasive prostate adenocarcinoma), relative to expression levels in normal epithelium, stromal cells, and benign prostatic hyperplasia [42].

The biological impact of hypoxia is exerted through transcriptional factors, such as Oct3/4 and Nanog [43]. Oct3/4 and Nanog are key players in a transcriptional network for maintenance of embryonic stem cell and primordial germ cells self-renewal [6], [11]. Our present study revealed that Oct3/4 and Nanog were expressed in the prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU145, albeit in a lower level. Invasive tumor cells are shown with a stem-like genomic signature expressing a number of stem cell genes, including Oct3/4 and Nanog and these cells are more tumorigenic compared to their non-invasive counterpart [44]. In our present study, we found that the expressions of these genes were upregulated upon hypoxia exposure, at both the mRNA and protein levels, in parallel with the increasing expressions of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. The upregulation of Oct3/4 expression could be correlated with the enhanced HIF-2α expression under hypoxia and this observation is consistent with previous findings that HIF-2α binds to the promoter of Oct3/4 and induces its expression and activity directly [45], supporting a potential role for the interaction of HIF-2α and Oct3/4 in prostate cancer cells response to hypoxia.

In order to discriminate whether the upregulated NANOG mRNA expression was derived from NANOG1 and/or NANOGP8 genes in response to hypoxia, specific primers and probes were used to detect the expressions of these two genes in PC-3 and DU145 cell lines under different oxygen tensions by quantitative RT-PCR. In line with previous reports, there was extremely low level NANOG1 expression in these cells [16], [29]. Although hypoxia could upregulate the expression of this gene in both cell lines, the expressions of the gene in these cells were still very low even in the cells under hypoxia. However, the NANOGP8 was expressed in higher levels in both cell lines under normoxia, and its expression was greatly upregulated by hypoxia, with up to 6-fold and 10-fold increase in the PC-3 and DU145 cell lines, respectively, indicating that NANOGP8 expression was predominantly influenced by hypoxia. Since Nanog protein expression was upregulated under hypoxia, and the cells under hypoxia revealed greater stem-like features, our results may support the notion that NANOGP8 plays an important role on the cancer stem-like properties in prostate cancer cells [16], [29].

It is well documented that oxygen plays an important role in the development of tissues and cells. Hypoxia often occurs in pathophysiological conditions, especially when growth exceeds the blood supply in the tumor. It has been speculated that the formation of a hypoxic niche may drive selection of cancer stem cells that can maintain tumors by regulating specific developmental programs. Based on these reports, we wanted to know whether hypoxia influenced cell proliferation. Although there was no statistically significant difference between cells' proliferation under hypoxia compared to that under normoxia, the cells grew slowly under hypoxia with extended G0/G1, indicating higher quiescent status of these cells in hypoxia.

To study the effect of hypoxia on stem-like cell phenotypes, we assessed the fraction of side population cells. The side population assay has been successfully used for identification of cancer stem-like cells in studies of common urological malignancies, including prostate, bladder, and renal cancers [47]. Our experiments revealed a significantly higher number of side population cells in both the PC-3 and DU145 cells that were treated with 48 hours in 1% O2, strongly indicating that stem-like properties of these cancer cells could be greatly upregulate in vitro. Side population cells contain active ATP-cassette family members (e.g., ABCG2) that can pump Hoechst 33342 dye out of the cells and ABCG2 is associated with multi-drug resistance. Importantly, ABCG2 is a key molecular determinant for the side population cells and has been reviewed as a universal stem cell marker [33]. Consistent with the elevated fraction of side population cells, the expression of ABCG2 was correspondingly increased in the cells treated at 1% O2 tension, in comparison with the cells cultivated at 20% O2 for both cell lines. Since CD44 is considered a putative surface marker for cancer stem/progenitor cells in breast and prostate cancers [19], [22], [48], [49], we analyzed CD44 expressions in these cells as well. Our study showed that CD44 expression was significantly induced under hypoxia. The putative prostate cancer stem-like cell marker CD44 has been associated with prostate cancer stem like feature [46], and has been indicated to play an essential role in the quiescence of hematopoietic stem cells in the osteoblastic niche [50]. The extended G0/G1 stage and induced CD44 and ABCG2 expressions in our present study may suggest more slow-cycling cancer stem-like cells under hypoxia, which is in line with the study reported by Ishimoto et al [51].

Both CD44 and ABCG2 have been strongly indicated as stem cell markers in previous studies [19], [52], [53]. In the present study, we examined these two factors in the same cell populations, in order to explore whether their responses to hypoxic treatments were related. Using flow cytometry, we found that most of the PC-3 and DU145 cells were CD44 positive, but only a small portion of cells in these two cell lines were ABCG2 positive. The ABCG2 positive cells were mostly CD44bright cells, and hypoxia induced expressions of CD44 and ABCG2 in both cell lines, indicating that ABCG2 expression may be associated with CD44bright cells. Next, we sorted the CD44bright cells and verified that they were primarily strongly positivity for ABCG2. On the contrary, all the CD44dim cells were almost ABCG2 negative. Furthermore, there were higher levels ABCG2 expressions in the hypoxia pretreated CD44bright cells than the CD44bright cells without hypoxia-pretreatment in both cell lines. Collectively, our results suggest a strong association between ABCG2+ and CD44bright cells.

In consistent with previous report that both NANOGP8 mRNA and Nanog protein are enriched in the CD44bright human prostate cancer cells [16], we also found that higher protein expressions of Oct3/4 and Nanog in the CD44bright cells compared to the corresponding CD44dim cells. Moreover, we examined additional stemness features of these cells using colony formation and sphere growth assays. These experiments showed that the CD44bright cells formed more colonies than the CD44dim cells. The sphere growth assay also showed significantly higher sphere formation efficiency for the CD44bright cells, and this finding is supported by the former report that CD44bright prostate cancer cells display stem –like characteristics such as more proliferative, clonogenic, tumorigenic and metastatic than the corresponding CD44dim cells [54]. Furthermore, the colony efficiency of the CD44bright cells was significantly improved following hypoxic pretreatment, whereas the CD44dim cells did not respond to such hypoxic exposure. Since colony formation and sphere formation capabilities are confined to stem cells [46], [55], [56], these results may support the hypothesis that CD44bright cells possess stem-like properties in the prostate cancer cells [54].

In summary, hypoxia enhanced the stem-like properties of the human prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU145. Hypoxic treatment also induced growth capability of CD44 positive cells in these two cell lines, and CD44bright cells possessed greater stem cell-like features, as verified by higher expressions of stemness factors and ABCG2, and significantly higher colony and sphere formation efficiency. Furthermore, the stem-like properties of the CD44bright cells were significantly increased upon hypoxic pretreatment.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YM DL ZS. Performed the experiments: YM DL JL. Analyzed the data: YM DL JL KA GK TS JMN ZS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZS. Wrote the paper: YM DL JL KA GK TS JMN ZS.

References

  1. 1. Crea F, Mathews LA, Farrar WL, Hurt EM (2009) Targeting prostate cancer stem cells. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 9: 1105–13.
  2. 2. Maitland NJ, Collins AT (2008) Prostate cancer stem cells: a new target for therapy. J Clin Oncol 26: 2862–70.
  3. 3. Marignol L, Coffey M, Lawler M, Hollywood D (2008) Hypoxia in prostate cancer: a powerful shield against tumour destruction? Cancer Treat Rev 34: 313–27.
  4. 4. Sharifi N, Kawasaki BT, Hurt EM, Farrar WL (2006) Stem cells in prostate cancer: resolving the castrate-resistant conundrum and implications for hormonal therapy. Cancer Biol Ther 5: 901–6.
  5. 5. Heddleston JM, Li Z, Lathia JD, Bao S, Hjelmeland AB, et al. (2010) Hypoxia inducible factors in cancer stem cells. Br J Cancer 102: 789–95.
  6. 6. Bae KM, Su Z, Frye C, Mcclellan S, Allan RW, et al. (2010) Expression of pluripotent stem cell reprogramming factors by prostate tumor initiating cells. J Urol 183: 2045–53.
  7. 7. Chen C, Wei Y, Hummel M, Hoffmann TK, Gross M, et al. (2011) Evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer stem cells of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One 6: e16466.
  8. 8. Nirasawa S, Kobayashi D, Tsuji N, Kuribayashi K, Watanabe N (2009) Diagnostic relevance of overexpressed Nanog gene in early lung cancers. Oncol Rep 22: 587–91.
  9. 9. Peng S, Maihle NJ, Huang Y (2010) Pluripotency factors Lin28 and Oct4 identify a sub-population of stem cell-like cells in ovarian cancer. Oncogene 29: 2153–9.
  10. 10. Saigusa S, Tanaka K, Toiyama Y, Yokoe T, Okugawa Y, et al. (2009) Correlation of CD133, OCT4, and SOX2 in rectal cancer and their association with distant recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 3488–98.
  11. 11. Sotomayor P, Godoy A, Smith GJ, Huss WJ (2009) Oct4A is expressed by a subpopulation of prostate neuroendocrine cells. Prostate 69: 401–10.
  12. 12. Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, et al. (2008) An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet 40: 499–507.
  13. 13. Sperger JM, Chen X, Draper JS, Antosiewicz JE, Chon CH, et al. (2003) Gene expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and human pluripotent germ cell tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 13350–5.
  14. 14. Ambady S, Malcuit C, Kashpur O, Kole D, Holmes WF, et al. (2010) Expression of NANOG and NANOGP8 in a variety of undifferentiated and differentiated human cells. Int J Dev Biol 54: 1743–54.
  15. 15. Zhang J, Wang X, Li M, Han J, Chen B, et al. (2006) NANOGP8 is a retrogene expressed in cancers. Febs J 273: 1723–30.
  16. 16. Jeter CR, Badeaux M, Choy G, Chandra D, Patrawala L, et al. (2009) Functional evidence that the self-renewal gene NANOG regulates human tumor development. Stem Cells 27: 993–1005.
  17. 17. Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ (2005) Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 65: 10946–51.
  18. 18. Miki J, Furusato B, Li H, Gu Y, Takahashi H, et al. (2007) Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens. Cancer Res 67: 3153–61.
  19. 19. Palapattu GS, Wu C, Silvers CR, Martin HB, Williams K, et al. (2009) Selective expression of CD44, a putative prostate cancer stem cell marker, in neuroendocrine tumor cells of human prostate cancer. Prostate 69: 787–98.
  20. 20. Bhatt RI, Brown MD, Hart CA, Gilmore P, Ramani VA, et al. (2003) Novel method for the isolation and characterisation of the putative prostatic stem cell. Cytometry A 54: 89–99.
  21. 21. Cortes-Dericks L, Carboni GL, Schmid RA, Karoubi G (2010) Putative cancer stem cells in malignant pleural mesothelioma show resistance to cisplatin and pemetrexed. Int J Oncol 37: 437–44.
  22. 22. Hurt EM, Kawasaki BT, Klarmann GJ, Thomas SB, Farrar WL (2008) CD44+ CD24(−) prostate cells are early cancer progenitor/stem cells that provide a model for patients with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 98: 756–65.
  23. 23. Liu T, Xu F, Du X, Lai D, Liu T, et al. (2010) Establishment and characterization of multi-drug resistant, prostate carcinoma-initiating stem-like cells from human prostate cancer cell lines 22RV1. Mol Cell Biochem 340: 265–73.
  24. 24. Forristal CE, Wright KL, Hanley NA, Oreffo RO, Houghton FD (2010) Hypoxia inducible factors regulate pluripotency and proliferation in human embryonic stem cells cultured at reduced oxygen tensions. Reproduction 139: 85–97.
  25. 25. Ma T, Grayson WL, Frohlich M, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2009) Hypoxia and stem cell-based engineering of mesenchymal tissues. Biotechnol Prog 25: 32–42.
  26. 26. Kim Y, Lin Q, Glazer PM, Yun Z (2009) Hypoxic tumor microenvironment and cancer cell differentiation. Curr Mol Med 9: 425–34.
  27. 27. Kim Y, Lin Q, Zelterman D, Yun Z (2009) Hypoxia-regulated delta-like 1 homologue enhances cancer cell stemness and tumorigenicity. Cancer Res 69: 9271–80.
  28. 28. Malladi P, Xu Y, Chiou M, Giaccia AJ, Longaker MT (2007) Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha deficiency affects chondrogenesis of adipose-derived adult stromal cells. Tissue Eng 13: 1159–71.
  29. 29. Jeter CR, Liu B, Liu X, Chen X, Liu C, et al. (2011) NANOG promotes cancer stem cell characteristics and prostate cancer resistance to androgen deprivation. Oncogene 30: 3833–45.
  30. 30. Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, et al. (2003) In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 17: 1253–70.
  31. 31. Kim JH, Jee MK, Lee SY, Han TH, Kim BS, et al. (2009) Regulation of adipose tissue stromal cells behaviors by endogenic Oct4 expression control. PLoS One 4: e7166.
  32. 32. Yasuda SY, Tsuneyoshi N, Sumi T, Hasegawa K, Tada T, et al. (2006) NANOG maintains self-renewal of primate ES cells in the absence of a feeder layer. Genes Cells 11: 1115–23.
  33. 33. Pascal LE, Oudes AJ, Petersen TW, Goo YA, Walashek LS, et al. (2007) Molecular and cellular characterization of ABCG2 in the prostate. BMC Urol 7: 6.
  34. 34. Mori R, Dorff TB, Xiong S, Tarabolous CJ, Ye W, et al. (2010) The relationship between proangiogenic gene expression levels in prostate cancer and their prognostic value for clinical outcomes. Prostate 70: 1692–700.
  35. 35. Khandrika L, Lieberman R, Koul S, Kumar B, Maroni P, et al. (2009) Hypoxia-associated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated androgen receptor activation and increased HIF-1alpha levels contribute to emergence of an aggressive phenotype in prostate cancer. Oncogene 28: 1248–60.
  36. 36. Koh MY, Powis G (2009) HAF: the new player in oxygen-independent HIF-1alpha degradation. Cell Cycle 8: 1359–66.
  37. 37. Kimbro KS, Simons JW (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in human breast and prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 13: 739–49.
  38. 38. Park JY, Park JW, Suh SI, Baek WK (2009) D-glucosamine down-regulates HIF-1alpha through inhibition of protein translation in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382: 96–101.
  39. 39. Bryant CS, Munkarah AR, Kumar S, Batchu RB, Shah JP, et al. (2010) Reduction of hypoxia-induced angiogenesis in ovarian cancer cells by inhibition of HIF-1 alpha gene expression. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282: 677–83.
  40. 40. Hua K, Din J, Cao Q, Feng W, Zhang Y, et al. (2009) Estrogen and progestin regulate HIF-1alpha expression in ovarian cancer cell lines via the activation of Akt signaling transduction pathway. Oncol Rep 21: 893–8.
  41. 41. Shin J, Lee HJ, Jung DB, Jung JH, Lee HJ, et al. (2011) Suppression of STAT3 and HIF-1 Alpha Mediates Anti-Angiogenic Activity of Betulinic Acid in Hypoxic PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells. PLoS One 6: e21492.
  42. 42. Monsef N, Helczynski L, Lundwall A, Pahlman S (2007) Localization of immunoreactive HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in neuroendocrine cells of both benign and malignant prostate glands. Prostate 67: 1219–29.
  43. 43. Li Z, Rich JN (2010) Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factors in cancer stem cell maintenance. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 345: 21–30.
  44. 44. Mathews LA, Hurt EM, Zhang X, Farrar WL (2010) Epigenetic regulation of CpG promoter methylation in invasive prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer 9: 267.
  45. 45. Covello KL, Kehler J, Yu H, Gordan JD, Arsham AM, et al. (2006) HIF-2alpha regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev 20: 557–70.
  46. 46. Li H, Chen X, Calhoun-Davis T, Claypool K, Tang DG (2008) PC3 human prostate carcinoma cell holoclones contain self-renewing tumor-initiating cells. Cancer Res 68: 1820–5.
  47. 47. Oates JE, Grey BR, Addla SK, Samuel JD, Hart CA, et al. (2009) Hoechst 33342 side population identification is a conserved and unified mechanism in urological cancers. Stem Cells Dev 18: 1515–22.
  48. 48. Marsden CG, Wright MJ, Pochampally R, Rowan BG (2009) Breast tumor-initiating cells isolated from patient core biopsies for study of hormone action. Methods Mol Biol 590: 363–75.
  49. 49. Ponti D, Zaffaroni N, Capelli C, Daidone MG (2006) Breast cancer stem cells: an overview. Eur J Cancer 42: 1219–24.
  50. 50. Arai F, Suda T (2007) Maintenance of quiescent hematopoietic stem cells in the osteoblastic niche. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1106: 41–53.
  51. 51. Ishimoto T, Oshima H, Oshima M, Kai K, Torii R, et al. (2010) CD44+ slow-cycling tumor cell expansion is triggered by cooperative actions of Wnt and prostaglandin E2 in gastric tumorigenesis. Cancer Sci 101: 673–8.
  52. 52. Krishnamurthy P, Ross DD, Nakanishi T, Bailey-Dell K, Zhou S, et al. (2004) The stem cell marker Bcrp/ABCG2 enhances hypoxic cell survival through interactions with heme. J Biol Chem 279: 24218–25.
  53. 53. Mohan A, Kandalam M, Ramkumar HL, Gopal L, Krishnakumar S (2006) Stem cell markers: ABCG2 and MCM2 expression in retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 889–93.
  54. 54. Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Li H, Bhatia B, et al. (2006) Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene 25: 1696–708.
  55. 55. Hong SP, Wen J, Bang S, Park S, Song SY (2009) CD44-positive cells are responsible for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Cancer 125: 2323–31.
  56. 56. Lukacs RU, Lawson DA, Xin L, Zong Y, Garraway I, et al. (2008) Epithelial stem cells of the prostate and their role in cancer progression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 73: 491–502.