An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

Michael R. Martin; Andrea Kopstein; Joy M. Janice

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013526

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

Michael R. Martin ,

* E-mail: martinm@csr.nih.gov

Affiliation Office of the Director, Center for Scientific Review, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
⨯
Andrea Kopstein,

Affiliation Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Director of the Office of Program Analysis, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
⨯
Joy M. Janice

Affiliation Tunnell Government Services, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
⨯

An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

Michael R. Martin,
Andrea Kopstein,
Joy M. Janice

Published: November 17, 2010
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013526

About the Authors

Michael R. Martin

* E-mail: martinm@csr.nih.gov

Affiliation Office of the Director, Center for Scientific Review, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

Andrea Kopstein

Affiliation Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Director of the Office of Program Analysis, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

Joy M. Janice

Affiliation Tunnell Government Services, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America

Competing Interests

Drs. Martin and Kopstein are employees of the Department of Health and Human Services. Ms. Janice is a consultant. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MRM. Performed the experiments: MRM AK. Analyzed the data: MRM AK JMJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AK JMJ. Wrote the paper: MRM AK JMJ.

Subject Areas
?

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.
We want your feedback. Do these Subject Areas make sense for this article? Click the target next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. Thanks for your help!

Peer review
Is the Subject Area "Peer review" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Careers
Is the Subject Area "Careers" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Government funding of science
Is the Subject Area "Government funding of science" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Governments
Is the Subject Area "Governments" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Legislation
Is the Subject Area "Legislation" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Research funding
Is the Subject Area "Research funding" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
Scientists
Is the Subject Area "Scientists" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.
United States
Is the Subject Area "United States" applicable to this article?

Thanks for your feedback.