Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Referee Comments: Referee 1

Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 12 Jun 2007 at 13:59 GMT

Reviewer 1's Review

“The paper deals with an interesting topic. The authors tackling a difficult task however; manuscript needs considerable work to improve quality and clarity. Paper should be informative, precise and brief. Unfortunately, this paper does not possess these attributes. The most important limitations of the present study are: its luck of consistency, erroneous terminology use, unclear sentences in the text. Tables and figures should be reorganized.”

N.B. These are the general comments made by the reviewer when reviewing this paper in light of which the manuscript was revised. Specific points addressed during revision of the paper are not shown.

RE: Referee Comments: Referee 1

RHNi replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 18 Jun 2007 at 12:34 GMT

It is always interesting to take part of reviewers' comments, but in this particular case it appears to me that the post was made for a purpose. What was it?

RHN