Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Mean RTs?

Posted by Benambridge on 09 Feb 2014 at 17:25 GMT

Sorry if this was in the paper or supplementary materials somewhere, but I couldn't find it. What was the Mean RT and SD for this study, and how does it compare with other studies? The best estimate I could find elsewhere seemed to be M=275ms, SD=160 (from Woodley et al, 2013).

No competing interests declared.

RE: Mean RTs?

Benambridge replied to Benambridge on 11 Feb 2014 at 15:08 GMT

Sorry, found it! M=243, SD=58 - so a very similar mean but much smaller SD

No competing interests declared.