Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeReal World Application?
Posted by nsa122 on 21 Nov 2012 at 19:57 GMT
Specifically, during each trial step of the QIC strategy of the experiments reported here, 100 agents are randomly partitioned into 10 teams of 10. Each agent (except the fittest agent in each team) independently selects one feature with the greatest difference in mean feature value between teammates with survival probability above and below the survival probability of the agent, and such that the consensus feature value of the fitter agents is different than the current feature value for the agent (a.k.a. local feature selection). These agents then conduct single-center trials (Np patients each) on the selected feature in their local contexts, where half of the agent's cases are tested with the selected feature value set to −1, and half tested with the feature value set to 1. QIC agents adopt the feature observed to yield higher survival, without regard to statistical significance.
http://plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0049901#article1.body1.sec2.sec2.sec3.p1
Can someone provide an example of what this would look like in "the real world"? Thanks.
RE: Real World Application?
maggieeppstein replied to nsa122 on 05 Dec 2012 at 20:02 GMT
Thanks for your interest in our work. Real-world applications are discussed in references [32], [41], [42] in the paper. You can also see some quality improvement collaboratives described briefly at: http://www.vtoxford.org/q....