Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeSorry for the Figure parts missing
Posted by ramiromh on 15 Nov 2012 at 16:17 GMT
Please, be aware that due to some error during the production of the final copy, the multipart Figures 1, 4 and 5 are only showing the A) subfigures. I am terribly sorry and embarrassed by this error, which it is a genuine mistake somewhere between my end and that at PLoS ONE. I hope that the helpful staff of PLoS ONE can amend it as soon as possible. In the meantime I have uploaded the complete figures (also the xml files used for the phylogenetic analyses) in Dryad, and am still awaiting for approval. Nevertheless, they have a provisional DOI: doi:10.5061/dryad.v0t0d
Nevertheless, those parts of Figures 1, 4 and 5 that appear are correct, only the B subfigures are missing. Furthermore, the incomplete figures do not modify our findings or conclusions.
Again, sorry for the mistake and hope that, despite this, the potential readers find the paper of interest. I welcome any comment and if there is any doubt I would be very happy to discuss it.
Sincerely
Ramiro Morales-Hojas