Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeOpportunity cost
Posted by RCampbell on 24 Jun 2012 at 08:37 GMT
Net returns from livestock in semi-arid African rangelands ($10–$30/km2/year in areas with 400–800 ml of annual rainfall [34]) are similar to those from trophy hunting in some areas (mean $–24 to $164/km2); hence, maximizing returns from hunting is key to ensuring competitiveness of wildlife-based land uses.
http://plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029332#article1.body1.sec4.sec5.p1
This is an important point that should be given more thorough exploration. On a per hectare basis, hunting struggles to compete with other land uses, including photographic tourism, agriculture and cattle raising. Other authors such as Baldus and Cauldwell point out that in Tanzania’s Selous Game Reserve (SGR):
"Income generation per unit area from all hunting areas of Tanzania is approximately US$ 40/km². Hunting income per unit area for the SGR is approximately US$ 70/km²
Photographic tourism in the SGR generated approximately US$ 130/km² prior to a recent expansion of the area." (p12)
The rate of lion hunting is unlikely to have any effect on the industry’s ability to compete with higher earning land uses.
Baldus, R, and A Cauldwell. 2004. Tourist hunting and its role in development of wildlife management areas in. In Sixth International Game Ranching Symposium – Paris July 6-9, 2004, 1-45. Paris, France.