Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeI guess the expression of 'N', eqn (1) is wrong:
Posted by ratulchowdhury on 21 Jun 2012 at 10:16 GMT
the expression of equation(1) should be
N(td)= ......exp( 1- (td/toff)) instead of being ...........exp ((1- dt)/toff) .
otherwise it creates a dimensional inhomogenity as we cannot subtract td from 1 - as the former has unit of seconds while the later is a constant.
Please make note of it and kindly inform me, in any case there is any supportive mathematics to it. The supplementary part that shows the derivation also does not elucidate it, it just gives away the result claiming it to be same in the last step from the penultimate step.
Am kindly looking forward to hearing from you.
RE: I guess the expression of 'N', eqn (1) is wrong:
pannib replied to ratulchowdhury on 24 Jun 2012 at 22:34 GMT
t_d is expressed in frames. In reading carefully the supplementary materials you will find that:
"Here we will refer to the td and toff as of multiples of
the frame rate acquisition time (i.e. td=1 is equivalent to td =50 ms in the text, td =2 is
equivalent to td =100 ms and so on...)."