Advertisement
Research Article

Ecological Importance of Large-Diameter Trees in a Temperate Mixed-Conifer Forest

  • James A. Lutz mail,

    jlutz@uw.edu

    Affiliation: College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

    X
  • Andrew J. Larson,

    Affiliation: Department of Forest Management, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

    X
  • Mark E. Swanson,

    Affiliation: School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America

    X
  • James A. Freund

    Affiliation: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

    X
  • Published: May 02, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036131

Reader Comments (2)

Post a new comment on this article

The disproportionate effects of large trees

Posted by bondlamberty on 07 May 2012 at 10:54 GMT

The occurrence, spatial distribution, and ecological importance of large trees--say, the top 1% by diameter--are infrequently quantified, as these trees are by definition rare and usually difficult to study. Here Lutz et al. report establishing the permanent Yosemite Forest Dynamics Plot (YFDP) in an old-growth conifer forest. In this >25 ha plot they measured biomass and spatial patterns of trees with diameters of at least 1 m, and found that these giants dominated aboveground biomass, and their spatial pattern differed from that of smaller trees. Traditional theories of self-thinning and competition could not satisfactorily explain the occurrence of the large trees. This--ecosystems where a large proportion of ecosystem services are performed by a few large trees--has significant implications for forest management. Lutz and colleagues' YFDP provides a strong foundation for future exploration of these implications.

No competing interests declared.