Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeAn alternative hypothesis...
Posted by kausikdatta on 01 Jun 2011 at 12:06 GMT
Thanks to Owen et al. for this very interesting study. As and when the fMRI techniques mature, we should get to see more of such studies. I had a quick question about the hypothesis tested in the current study: Is it possible to analyze the same observations from a diametrically opposite perspective?
What I mean is this: Is it possible that -
(a) Hippocampal atrophy (or some non-pathognomonic reduction in volume) is age related?
(b) Given that all the subjects were 58+ years in age, the median size of hippocampus measured in non-believers is the right size (baseline) for that age or age-range?
(c) Introduction to religion at an early age, moderate religious feelings, participation in religious rituals and so forth may cause a surge of emotions - especially conflicting emotions and sentiments regarding religion, with increased exposure to different worldviews - which can lead to hippocampal hypertrophy in the believer group?
(d) Those who have experienced LCREs or found religion late ("born-again") are so firmly adherent to their belief systems, that they no longer experience any doubt, uncertainty or a lack of conviction - and therefore, are not subject to strong emotional upheavals in a chronic manner; as a consequence, their hippocampal volume returns to the baseline?
Would this be a valid alternative hypothesis?