Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

For a properly formatted version, see my blog

Posted by Phillord on 05 Sep 2010 at 10:02 GMT

Unfortunately, PLoS One have not managed to format this article correctly. Despite several emails on the topic, they have still failed to reproduce the semantically meaningful teletype font, which makes the paper harder to read. With luck, I'll be able to get them to fix this. In the meantime, you might want to read http://www.russet.org.uk/... where the article has been reproduced with courier intact.

Competing interests declared: I paid for and wrote the article.

RE: For a properly formatted version, see my blog

Phillord replied to Phillord on 15 Sep 2010 at 11:11 GMT

The formatting has largely been fixed now!

Competing interests declared: I wrote the article.

RE: For a properly formatted version, see my blog

Phillord replied to Phillord on 15 Sep 2010 at 11:29 GMT

The URL in my original comment is broken, as the PLoS One comment system included a comma in the URL. Unfortunately, it's not editable.

Hopefully, the URL following this paragraph will be correct.

http://www.russet.org.uk/...

Competing interests declared: I wrote the paper.