Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closePublisher's Note: Error in sentence in Results and Discussion
Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 15 Dec 2010 at 22:35 GMT
For most programs available, there is better poor resolution for I-Ab (Figure 6A) than for I-As (Figure 6B), possibly reflecting the larger database of known I-Ab-restricted T cell determinants of Ag.
http://plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0015050#article1.body1.sec2.sec3.p5
There was an error in the 7th paragraph in the Results and Discussion section. The correct sentence is: “For most programs available, there is better resolution for I-Ab (Figure 6A) than for I-As (Figure 6B), possibly reflecting the larger database of known I-Ab-restricted T cell determinants of Ag.”
RE: Error in sentence in Results and Discussion
zamvil replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 15 Dec 2010 at 23:20 GMT
Thank you. You are correct. We are aware of this error. In the proof, the authors provided the correct sentence (as you also wrote):
"For most programs available, there is better resolution for I-Ab (Figure 6A) than for I-As (Figure 6B), possibly reflecting the larger database of known I-Ab-restricted T cells of Ag."
The word "poor" after "better" is incorrect.
Again, thank you.