Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Publisher's Note: Errors in Article

Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 23 Aug 2013 at 16:53 GMT

The p-value describing the significance of the negative relationship between percent body fat and energy intake in the boys is correctly described as p=0.15 in Table 2, but incorrectly as p=0.05 in the Abstract and in the third paragraph of the Relationships subsection of the Results section.

There was an error in the Figure 2 legend. The legend should read:

Figure 2. The cross-section relationship, with 95% confidence intervals, between %BF and total energy intake (the average number of kilojoules consumed per day) for boys and girls, combining data from both measurement periods.

No competing interests declared.