Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeSheet Music
Posted by BruceDeitrickPrice on 20 Aug 2010 at 22:52 GMT
I suspect the most convenient parallel with the reading process is what an expert pianist does when sight-reading a new piece of music. A process, by the way, which unfolds at extraordinary speed. The brain must identify and respond to each individual note. There can be no thought of clunking or otherwise processing a group of notes (as a group). No, the job must be done one note at a time. Second, there can be no thought that context (or any similar word) plays any part in this process. It's a D, a quarter-note, and that's all-- play it.
One factor that makes all this research so complex is that the brain appears to me to be an equal opportunity problem-solver. it will use any trick in the book to make a determination, and keep moving. The idea that the brain does something the same way every time is probably a dead-end. One thing we can be sure of is that the brain will not do something the slow way if possible. I think this explains why, given time, even children taught to read with sight-words will eventually work their way to reading phonetically. But this detour will leave scars.
I confess to being very cynical about the Education Establishment. Having said that, I can now voice my opinion that 80% of what one hears about reading (for the past 75 years) is propaganda designed to protect Whole Word. That is, protect it from its much deserved extinction.