Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeMore information
Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 07 Feb 2008 at 01:24 GMT
For the analysis of Calbindin, 3 animals per group (E15 EC and SC) were used.
http://plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0001160#article1.body1.sec4.sec7.p2
The authors have provided the following addition to this section:
Immunostaining of enriched and control retinal sections was performed in parallel within the same experimental set. Images of RGC portions were acquired at 20x magnification using a Zeiss HR Axiocam videocamera connected to a Zeiss Axiophot microscope and digitalized by Axiovision software. To compare different specimens, the time of exposure was optimized at the start and then held constant throughout image acquisition.
Collected images were imported to the image analysis system MetaMorph and used to evaluate pixel intensity of cellular immunofluorescence. All image analyses were done blind. For IGF-I, pixel intensity was measured within the area contoured by the edges of the RGC layer, while for DCX the area was centered in the neuroblastic layer. Immunofluorescence intensity levels were calculated as the ratio between the pixel intensity and the background level, measured in the outer nuclear layer for IGF-I analysis and in the inner part of the retina for DCX analysis. Values obtained from at least 8-10 retinal fields were used to calculate the average pixel intensity value per animal.