Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeWhat about the tail?
Posted by bsn8 on 31 May 2009 at 01:03 GMT
This fossil greatly intrigues me, but the publicity and the hype leaves many questions unanswered. With all the efforts to connect this fossil to human evolution, no one has yet addressed the creature's tail, which seems suspicious.
RE: What about the tail?
keesey replied to bsn8 on 01 Jun 2009 at 04:59 GMT
The authors consider this species to be close to the ancestors of *all* haplorhine primates -- not just humans, but apes, monkeys, and tarsiers as well. (But note that some other scientists consider this species to be on the strepsirrhine side, closer to lemurs and lorises.)
Humans have many ancestors, most of which we share with other living species. The authors are definitely *not* positing this species as ancestral to humans and nothing else alive. Some of the hype has indeed been misleading (although that's true of most scientific discoveries, it seems).