Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeMedia Coverage of This Article
Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 05 Jul 2013 at 19:20 GMT
The following article represents some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Science 2.0
Title: “Wikipedia Is Less Sexist, Thanks To A Survey Recount”
http://www.science20.com/...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
Media Coverage of This Article
PLOS_ONE_Group replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 29 Jul 2013 at 20:17 GMT
The following article represents some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Mother Board
Title: “Wikipedia Isn't Quite as Sexist as Everyone Thinks”
http://motherboard.vice.c...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
Media Coverage of This Article
PLOS_ONE_Group replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 05 Aug 2013 at 22:47 GMT
The following article represents some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Mother Board
Title: “Wikipedia Isnt Quite as Sexist as Everyone Thinks”
http://motherboard.vice.c...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.