Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeEvolution is the standard in Texas, not intellligent design
Posted by zfaulkes on 31 Mar 2011 at 19:46 GMT
In the introduction, the authors say, "in 2009 the Texas state education board voted to allow IDT to be taught alongside ET in science classes."
This is not true.
The current K-12 education standards do <b>not</b> allow the teaching of intelligent design. The standards (http://ritter.tea.state.t...) clearly mandate the teaching of evolution: "The student knows evolutionary theory is a scientific explanation for the unity and diversity of life."
There is no equivalent statement for intelligent design. Intelligent design is not mentioned in the Texas K-12 science standards at all.
It <b>is</b> true that the wording of some of the standards are weaker than they could be. There are aspects of the wording that is highly influenced by intelligent design. Even these, however, are incredibly weak statements. For example, one standard requires students “analyze and evaluate scientific explanations concerning any data of sudden appearance, stasis, and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record”. Someone favouring intelligent design would see these as problems for evolutionary theory, but that the standard only permits <b>scientific</b> explanations should only allow discussions of evolutionary theory, not intelligent design.
Similarly, another standard requiring students “analyze and evaluate scientific explanations concerning the complexity of the cell” is clearly influenced by the concept of "irreducible complexity” in intelligent design. Again, however, anyone who was not familiar with the intelligent design literature would probably see this as an innocuous statement, particularly given that it is again prefaced by the requirement that the students learn <b>scientific</b> explanations.
RE: Evolution is the standard in Texas, not intellligent design
Jason_Martens replied to zfaulkes on 04 Apr 2011 at 00:31 GMT
Thank you for your comment helping to clarify this issue. Upon reflection, we agree that the statement in question may be construed as an overstatement, given that the Texas science standards do not specifically mention intelligent design. However, the amendments made to the standards were clearly intended to allow discussion of intelligent design or creationism in the classroom, albeit through a “back door.” (See the relevant report from the National Earth Science Teachers Association, http://www.nestanet.org/c...)
In sum, it seems clear that there have been, and continue to be, attempts to bring intelligent design into science classrooms in Texas.
Jason Martens, Jess Tracy, Josh Hart