Search
Advanced Search

Retraction: An Integrated Approach to the Prediction of Chemotherapeutic Response in Patients with Breast Cancer

The chemotherapy sensitivity predictions as reported in this PLoS One article were based on an approach as described by Potti et al. in Nature Medicine (1). Reexamination of the validation datasets used for the Nature Medicine study has revealed the presence of errors in the labeling of clinical response in some datasets (2). Re-analysis of the predictive accuracy with correctly labeled data has shown that in two instances the reported signatures do not predict the response of the validation samples to chemotherapy (2). The authors of the Nature Medicine paper have therefore decided to retract that paper (2). Since the PLoS One article is based on the approach reported in the Nature Medicine article, we have decided to retract the PLoS One article. We apologize to readers for any inconvenience caused by the publication of our article in PLoS One.

References:

1. Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, et al. Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med. 2006;12(11):1294-300.

2. Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, et al. Retraction: Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med. 2011; 17: 135.

No competing interests declared.
Citation: Salter KH, Acharya CR, Walters KS, Redman R, Anguiano A, et al. (2011) Retraction: An Integrated Approach to the Prediction of Chemotherapeutic Response in Patients with Breast Cancer. PLoS ONE: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/annotation/8f94e479-4161-43a0-a28c-4c0460bb89a4

See all ongoing discussions on this article

Post Your Response
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Response
 
Declare any competing interests.

Comments can include the following markup tags:

Emphasis: ''italic''  '''bold'''  '''''bold italic'''''

Other: ^^superscript^^  ~~subscript~~

Why should this posting be reviewed?

See also Guidelines for Notes, Comments and Corrections.

Identify Reason for Flagging
Thank You!

Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.